Author Archives: rpendie

Breast Cancer

RUDOLF PENDIE

This work was created to disseminate breast cancer awareness among the population in my community. It is a great piece to understand the factors that could contribute to breast cancer. Follow the link (my name) to see the powerpoint presentation.

Advance Search

Advance searching comes in when we are getting lost in a poll of information. We know that regular search methods are not the best way to dig up relevant information. Badke has being able to advance my knowledge to search. He ask that one must be able to identify a broader topic which his/her topic maybe part of. Further that, he encouraged using the Boolean search mechanism. Most free popular search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing use keyword in search for information but college libraries will have a more sophisticated engine that may look for keywords and topic headings at the same time. We will definitely face some crisis in the future as most people turn to popularity rather than relevance. Searching using Google Schoolar is the best free engine I have used publicly t find resource-able information on the internet which can contribute to my paper.

Taking Charge

I am glad to have read this chapter before deciding on my research topic. It has taught me on how to approach and formulate question. Since I started thinking about a question nothing have helped in any direction I looked. I loved Badke statement “a thesis and research questions is a flip side of a coin.” This made me comprehend more on how to model my question so it will not lead me to a dead end while doing the research. Also as a junior student writing many papers I a thought my outline will come from my paper. I now under why it took me so long to write a piece of paper. Badke also warn us to stay away from wikipedia since anyone could edit the information thou it carries a bulk of info. He also commend us to understand the question then gather and synthesis data pertaining to the question.

KEYWORD AND SEARCH ENGINE

All three readings were meant to teach us how to narrow down our search results when using different types of search engine. As a result of these readings, I have learned other methods of searching a database even if I don’t know what the database is dedicated for. For instant i learnt that if I am searching a medical database, my differentiation should be other words other than medical terminologies. For example if I am searching diebetes among African-Americans, diebetes will be my keyword but my subsearch will be African-Americans to narrow down my results. I have also learnt how to use stem words to search for words of similar meanings which Badke term it searching using “wildcards.” We’ve also seen that major search engine providers will return different results based on location, time, events etc. Making many factors infleunce results may be good but poor in a sense that one can hardly get a replica of search he/she did earlier.

Metadata and research

First, my search strategies have shifted after I read this chapter of the book. I knew about the narrowing down words and using specific words to search databases but i didn’t know that they were differences between controlled vocabularies and keywords when searching.

At the beginning of the reading when Badke started talking about a standardize way of labeling different categories of books, made standardization looked bad. But he continue to say although it doesn’t give power to us to edit the tags or headings, it’s the best way to easily find things of the same content.

The advantage that the Library of Congress has put in place about searching for a particular topic is great. web browsers does not look for content of material in the article but it looks for whatever your typed in the search engine. To eliminate most of the unwanted results, we should start using more controlled vocabularies then use keywords to refine our results to reflect exactly what we searching in a database.

right to copy or copyright

If i knew Isserman I will like to ask him, When do we have to qoute the original source? I understand that copyright is a little soft on academic usage but does it give us the right to copy? Isserman claims that if a statement is repeated over time it become very common that we do not need to name the source. If we keep leaving the source unknown all the time will finally lost the original speaker. Example is “I have a Dream,” if these words keep flowing around with Martin Luther King’s name we will one day foget about the importance of such speech. Furthermore, the digital age has made it more easier for copy and paste that plagiarism is most common among students than ever. Digital remix has all the worse being the way to destruction of original work of arts. As long as we have this tools distributed to everyone we could only do damage control on copyright because students today have the right to copy.

privacy online

To my opinion we have no privacy as soon as we click on the post button on any website. We generally sign up for coupons and discounts to some web site, they ask us to agree to the “terms and conditions.” I had taken one day to read the “terms and condition” of one third party provider and all it kept emphasizing is that personal information may be used by some other party and its agents. These days we are so internet savvy, many companies use the internet to transmit information, let alone some of these files get interrupted and find itself online,  these same companies will not tell their customers about errors so the person is aware of their private information online. Example of such like in the 2010 New York Presbyterian patient information leak, the play station was secretly gathering personal information which found itself on the net, finally the collection of peoples location by Apple (iPhone 4). GPS locator is a great device but someone could map all  trips you make and will be able to sell that information to another party even without your concern. These are just a few privacy concerns but they are lots more that have not being mentioned.

Access: personal/institutions/government.

i enjoyed the reading by Martin. In many of the points he made were very crusial to undertand how most of our research are funded and how the results are distributed among the funders. the agenda who gives the largest amount of money will be kept in focus compare to its competitors who wants to follow similar research. we see how universities and colleges have turned in to deciplines, who bagain against themselves for funding. the elite member of every discipline wants to protect the core believe of his/her discipline. but my target of this reading which i find it so interesting is about student and professors.

Martin said that students are not in school for the knowledge but for the credentials. what does this means to our society? this means that students will go to any extreme to get what he/she is in school for, students will cheat in all sorts of ways from replicating their peers work to passing answers and question of exams.

inspite of what the students are doing to get credentials, professors are mostly focus on publications. at cuny, to keep tenur as a professor, you most have publish a few books and journals. professors care more about publishing and maintaining their jobs. i believe also that a good grade of students reflect a better teacher. hence if students cheat to have good grades with no knowledge and the teacher is publishing as required then the discipline may more funds.