The artists presented in the three readings present their different approaches when it comes to the future of art, and what different technologies hold. Their work can collectively be termed as the futuristic manifesto. According to the three authors, the future is endowed with speedy technologies that will deliver art to the world within a short period. Time and space are the possibilities of the future. The future of simultaneous implementations is what the authors envision. As technology will play the role of speedy art, the authors are optimistic that they will be propped to the stars.
The art and design that would follow is one of promise. As the artists flourish in their skill set, they anticipate a future that is constructive and creative and nature. They anticipate a future in which they will be innovators, more like modern-day engineers. In their collective thought of the future, the artists share in the common views of a technology that will help shape art and design. They also share in the common view that artists are the future creators and innovators. Despite their common perception of the future, they hold different views on how the future will be. Filippo Tomaso talks of beauty that is characterized by struggles. This is not what the other artists foresee. They see a future of splendor and beauty.
Artists are creators of the future. Even in their pieces of work, they normally have the future engraved in their art pieces. Since they are creators, they can be termed as engineers. This is the first statement that is true in the read pieces. Technology is a catalyst for speedy artistic growth. This is the second factual statement. Despite the truth, the mention of the fact that beauty exists in the struggle is problematic, as humanity cannot achieve.
Leave a Reply