The possibilities or advances that the authors envisioned for their immediate futures were very difficult to understand but I feel like that was their point, for it to be a reading in which you have to think twice. The role they imagined technology would play in shaping the futures would be that the tech was very helpful. At least for El Lissitzky (1926) the high end technology was helpful in the sense of bringing a community together, it helps with resources and so much more that the people can benefit from. In terms of how the art and design was anticipated, it went in an unclear path. However, for Lissitzky and Rodchenko, it was successful. In their readings, the technology was beneficial in every sense. That being said, both of these authors have a similarity. They both share those views on technology and the only difference between them would be how they would use technology. Rodchenko says, “we organize technology”, which is a weird thing to think about, but it makes sense. I feel like he’s talking about how we are responsible, in the sense that we control what happens on the internet. The elements that still remain relevant to the present would be the art and the hunger to succeed. For Lissitzky, “our best artist takes up the problem of book design”, which signifies that designers will always encounter problems when working. And lastly, the elements that would be problematic would be how dangerous design can be when hate comes into play.