I read about both articles, it both about science. The AI article is about how technology change scientist mind. They can discuss how AI can replace human in the future, in instead of things related to biology.  John Amonld is about people in the scientists filed have to prove everything they found. However in the reality, many of their research may not be true. People redo their experiment just found things can be wrong. Also they outcomes just want to fit people who are rich.Because many of their research are very much depend on their support. At the end, the filed of scientists have totally changing their mind of why their doing  it, it just getting result for money