Monthly Archives: October 2012

Who is to say what is or is not art? Nowadays, the word art seems to be thrown around a lot. Back in the days, there were rules to what is considered art, but thanks to artists’ like Duchamp and his … Continue reading →

I view the Burtynsky: Oil app is a vehicle Burtynsky uses to present his work. Like his award winning book or gallery show exhibitions, the app provides its own unique way to experience Burtynsky’s photographs and thoughts on his work. … Continue reading →

Just 7 months ago my friend got a chance to visit me. He lives in different country and it was his first visit to the USA, his first time seeing New York. I took him to Manhattan, expecting to see … Continue reading →

The way I see it, art is any piece of work that is aesthetically pleasing to the viewer’s eye.  Edward Burtynsky’s app version of his art book Oil, I consider art.  It is still Burtynsky’s work and his photographs, the … Continue reading →

Do you think the app can be considered an independent work of art? In my opinion app can be art, a matter of fact anything can be considered art. Who is actually sure what art really is? For example in … Continue reading →

Of course the app can be considered an independent work of art! It obviously has all the qualities that consider “art” to be art. It’s original, unique, and by far an amazing utilization of modern technology. I believe the renowned … Continue reading →

The way I understand it, art is an intentional depiction of appealing mixture of the form, composition and color. Art can be visual and auditory as well as functional. Art can be innovative, but more often it is an expression … Continue reading →