Materials and Methods

A laboratory report contains a section devoted to Materials and Methods. This is important because it indicates how to repeat the experiment or exercise as closely as it was performed initially. It reads out a little like a recipe. In a recipe, we know what the input materials are. We often refer to the ingredients as reagents since we often expect some sort of reaction to occur in our scientific inquiry. But ingredients alone do not adequately aid in the reproduction of an experiment. The methodology is equally important. Therefore, the language of the methodology must be clear and precise. We must respect the order in which procedures occur otherwise the outcomes will be different. Below is a food recipe as an example of how culinary experiments are performed. With the provided recipe — a series of materials and methods– we can try to reproduce the dish. We can also identify areas that can be varied with respect to materials and the methodology that would alter or enhance the outcome. In science, sometimes the methodology is fundamentally flawed and must be altered. The transparency of the process is important because it permits a review by peers to review and judge the validity of subsequent results.

How to make Cambodian style fish with spicy tomato sauce

The following is found at Open Source food and is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 by user Paula

Ingredients

Directions

  1. Sprinkle fish with cornstarch.
  2. Heat 2 tablespoon of oil and fry fish, when it’s golden brown remove from wok.
  3. Clean wok, heat 1 tablespoon of oil and fry garlic and onion about 1 minute, add celery, dried chili and tomato, stir and fry 4 minutes.
  4. Add fish sauce, soy sauce, sugar and black pepper.
  5. Pour tomato sauce over fish and garnish with spring onion, basil.

What’s different with these Materials/Methods?

Remember that we use metric units in science. Fortunately, volumetric measurements like tablespoon and teaspoon are standardly converted to milliliters. We’re not so lucky with other types of volumetric measurements, such as the Pint. One needs to be careful when speaking of pints since the imperial pint and the U.S. pint are different measurements. The dry pint obfuscates things further. Regardless of understanding these differences in measure, it is always preferable to speak in a standard term with scientific measurements reported in metric units. Let’s not even begin trying to fathom a conversion for a dash. Methods, in science, are not written out so plainly in a pointed form. The language is more descriptive. As we can see, there are many variations in outcomes for the included recipe. The methodology is a bit vague (lacking temperatures and standardization in cooking vessels). We have to remember that methodology in science should be much more repeatable.

Results

The Results section of a Lab Report is descriptive. It tells what is observed without analysis of the content. Graphical aids can help summarize the data. We often see the summaries as tables and graphs. Below is a common tabular summary of data that we come across on a daily basis.
US Nutritional Fact Label 2
The nutritional informational table from this box of Mac & Cheese provides a quick comparison of the contents in a serving and the recommended daily values. While a paragraph stating these values would be descriptive, the tabular form is much more effective at summarizing the information that is pertinent. As always, all figures (pictures, graphs and titles) should have proper labeling. Legends are also important to indicate abbreviations and symbols that pertain tot he data. The titles should be descriptive and all figures should be numbered in numerical sequence so the accompanying text can readily refer to the specific figure of interest. Titles and legends of graphical or tabular data should be informative so that they could be parsed readily without needing to search through the text of the Results section.

Results are written in the third person. They explain what was observed and should be stated in a fashion such as: “This happened…. The color changed to this…. Something happened in response to that…” Methodology does not play a role unless it is a result of the method. Simply re-iterating the methods is not appropriate.

That’s Empirical

Remember that observations are empirical. The scientific method is based on an existing corpus of knowledge. When we test our hypotheses formulated on a series of observations, we utilize experimentation to identify new observations. The use of our senses and experimentation yields data in the form of our observations. The Results section is about empiricism. It doesn’t take into account the analysis. If a tree fell in the woods, it is reported that a tree has fallen. How it might have fallen or why is irrelevant unless that was directly observed as well or a part of the experimental paradigm. Deciphering if it made a sound as it fell when no one was around to hear it would be a conclusion left for analysis and is not an observable report.