!) personally, the effect of voices desribing the historical events move me in a way that any other scientist would. this would be by passion. the reason i said passion is because of the excitement in their voices speaking about the event.

2) no i do not think it was appropriate  to take the cells froms a biopsy for personal research with out consent because talking something from someone with out them knowing regardless of what it is shows  a great sgin of disrespect eveen if the people is dead or alive.

3)i do not think it was ethical for the lab assistant to go into the morgue to retrieve more celles from the corpse with out the familys consent because their already did it once with out the consent for the family and to do it again is even more disrespectful not only to her that is already dead but to her family that dont kno anything about this and have to find out about this on the net.

4) i do think henrietta’s racial background did factered into the removal of her cells for such purposes without consent because if this was a white woman the case would be different. the reason i said this would be the fact that back in  the 1950’s when this was done there were still segregation between whites and blacks and whites people had the money and power back then.

5)i do think henriatta’s economical status factered into the removal of her cells based on the fact that people with a high economic status always had the reaspect given to them by others and were always seem to be the most important people.

6) yes i do think they are obligated to provide compensation to the lacks family because one they took the cells with out consent and didnt tell any of the family matters that have a right to anything concerning the body. also to have the cells floating around the world and still not telling the family any thing.