Professor Scanlan's OpenLab Course Site

Author: Shannon Forrester

Ethics in Othello

Ethics is defined as the principle that governs an individual’s behavior or conducting an activity that is either right or wrong. To go more in-depth with ethics, there are different types of normative ethics: deontology, virtue, utilitarian, feminist, and global.  The two ethics I will be addressing are virtue and utilitarianism ethics. Virtue ethics focuses on the morality of life, motives, relationships, and even themselves. It is also called “self-centered” and it does not guide how one should act. As for utilitarian ethics, it shows the right action, morally that produces the most good. its purpose is to make life better by doing good things (pleasure and happiness) and not focus on the bad things (pain and unhappiness). The film, Othello, directed by Oliver Parker, and the written version Othello by William Shakespeare, shows virtue and utilitarianism ethics.

Iago is the antagonist who uses his manipulation, yet honesty to determine his own utilitarianism ethics. He thrives on deceitfulness and uses everyone around him to fulfill his masterplans. In the written form, In Act, I, scene I, Iago tells Roderigo that he hates Othello because Othello did not give him the promotion as a lieutenant, but instead gave it to Cassio, despite having zero experience in leading men in battle. Iago also reveals that he is going to serve under Othello so he can advantage of him. Iago states, “Heaven is my judge, not I for love and duty.” This shows that he is willing to morally isolate himself to create a utilitarian outcome. This begins Iago’s utilitarianism ethics to follow his own rules and self-interest to plot against Othello and Cassio. In both versions of Othello, it shows how careless he is for others, but he devotes all of his time seeking revenge and not stopping until he is satisfied. He loves to see people downfalls to lift his pride. For instance, Cassio gets drunk with Montano and walks away. Iago begins talking with Montano advising that though Cassio is a great soldier, he fears that Cassio has a big responsibility because of his drinking problem.  When Montano tries to prevent a fight from happening between Cassio and Roderigo, he gets stabbed by Cassio. Othello comes out demanding to know what’s happening. Since Cassio and Montano could not speak, Iago intervened and faulted Cassio for the brawl and Othello fired Cassio as a lieutenant. Iago’s plan is accomplished which means his pride grows.

Desdemona is someone who shows her virtuous ethics throughout both the film and the written form. She is warm-hearted and caring, but her unproven innocence led to her demise by Othello. Due to Iago’s lie, Othello believed that she had an affair with Cassio, which she did not. She always claimed to be very faithful to her husband and loved him unconditionally. She is often levelheaded when it comes to solving conflict. For example, in Act 3, Scene 3, she says, “Do not doubt, Cassio, but I will have my lord and you again as friendly as you were.” Desdemona wants to reconcile Cassio’s loyalty with Othello. This was after Othello fired Cassio as lieutenant because of an altercation between him and Montano. In Act 4, Scene 2, towards Desdemona’s last moments before death, she says to Emilia and Iago, “His unkindness may defeat my life. But never taint my love.” This statement shows how committed she still is to Othello, despite his attitude he gave her once Iago tells him about her fake infidelity. Desdemona also sacrificed herself and her reputation for Othello. When Emilia finds her almost lifeless, Desdemona said how she was not murdered but in fact committed suicide, even after Othello confessed that he did the crime.

One major literary technique that William Shakespeare uses in the writing is symbolism. A handkerchief was the significant symbol of Othello’s love gift. It was gifted to Desdemona and proof that he loves her. It was patterned with strawberries on a white, silk background, woven by an Egyptian woman who gave it to Othello’s mother. The handkerchief is attached to some sort of myth: “…while she kept it. Twould make her amiable and subdue my father Entirely to her love, but if she lost it, or made gift of it, my father’s eye Should hold her loathèd and his spirits should hunt.” This shows how virtuous this gift is and how it plays in a marriage. If Desdemona lost it or gave it away, Othello will not forgive her and divorce her. In the film version, Oliver Parkers use close-up shots to convey the character’s emotions more consciously. For example, at the beginning of the film, Iago looks into the camera, describing his revenge against Desdemona, Cassio, and Othello in a soft, sinister tone voice. He also questions himself, “how am I a villain?” The music in this monologue sounds very suspenseful and dark, which matches the night sky and dark area in the background. Towards the end of this scene, he comfortably touches the hot stick that creates fire, without any hesitation.

Overall, Oliver Parker’s film is the radical translation of William Shakespeare’s book. The film reproduces the plot of the betrayal and utilitarian motives of Iago, Othello’s vulnerability, and Desdemona’s virtue ethics. It also paid attention to each important detail that gives context to what happened in each scene. Both texts show how one’s moral value dictates one’s behavior and how it is justified as right or wrong.

Final Draft Midterm

Shannon Forrester 

ENG 2400

Pro. Scanlan

10/29/2020

 

Laura Esquivel, Like Water for Chocolate (1992) and Alfonso Arau’s Like Water for Chocolate (1993)

Laura Esquivel’s novel, “Like Water for Chocolate,” is about a protagonist named Tita de la Garza, who lives in Mexico during the Revolutionary War, faces various hardships personally while maintaining the kitchen as Head cook for the family. With the abuse and intimation from her mother, the first antagonist, Mama Elena, and her desired lover, the second antagonist, Pedro, she finds difficulty finding the middle ground of it all. Every chapter follows up with each month of the year, delicious recipes, and food preparations that correlate with the plot. For instance, in April, the dish was turkey mole with almonds and sesame seeds. The ingredients include chile mulato, chiles anchos, lard, turkey stock, etc. For the prep, Esquivel adds, “two days after killing the turkey, clean it and cook with salt.” It shows how appetite and well-thought the recipes were.  The film, Like Water for Chocolate by Alfonso Arau, is very similar to the novel, however, it shows the main points of the story of Tita. Also, almost none of the preparation steps were shown in the film and many recipes were almost unapparent. According to Linda Cahir’s literature-to-film translations, traditional translation can be identified when comparing and contrasting the two versions. Traditional translation uses similarities to show the viewers or readers the main points or events of the story it is inspired by, without showing every by verbatim. From watching the film after reading the novel, it maintained the overall plot, settings of the novel, but reconstructed certain details that filmmakers saw as necessary and fitting for the viewers.   

Every main character in the novel plays an important role in Tita’s life. She is the youngest daughter amongst the other 3 sisters. She loves cooking and creating recipes with the cook of the house, Nacha for the family, due to her being born in the kitchen. She’s denied marriage because of Elena’s “family tradition:” the youngest child must not be married and take care of the mother until she dies. Although she follows this tradition, she’s introduced to a young man named Pedro who he seeks interest in marriage and unfathomed love starts to create. Mama Elena is the mother who belittles and abuses Tita for the simplest thing. She’s the head of the household and struggles to find peace with herself. Elena is the hardest roadblock for Tita to be with the man of her life. Pedro seeks interest in Tita but marries Rosaura, Elena’s eldest daughter. He often becomes selfish, jealous, and possessive of Tita, in efforts to regain Tita’s love assurance. The least but important character that is revealed at the ending of the story is Esperanza, who narrates the entire story and is the daughter of Pedro and Rosaura, great-niece of Tita. 

While the plot of the film version of “Like Water for Chocolate” is almost identical to Laura Esquivel’s novel, the lack of contexts when filming major scenes, and certain use of lighting that makes this translation traditional as stated by Linda Cahir. When proving this, I will first compare the scene with the Rose Petal fiasco between the film, and the novel. Then, I will explain how lowkey lighting plays a perspective on how the filmmakers interpret certain romance and dramatic scenes. Lastly, I will point out the different points of view from a male and female perspective, romantically. 

  1. In Chapter 3 of the story, the process for preparing the meal was to carefully remove the petals so your fingers won’t get pricked. Esperanza states, “…little wounds painful but the petals could soak up the blood that might alter the flavor of the dish and even produce dangerous chemical reactions” (45). Pedro gives Tita a rose bouquet has a sympathy gift after her losing Nacha, the house cook. Once Tita accepts it, it pricks her on her chest and hands. Tita cooks quail in rose petal sauce, with one of the roses she was gifted. Everyone who eats the meal feels aroused, except Rosaura, who felt nauseous, but Gertrudis had a strange experience. She begins to imagine herself with Juan, who she notices while going to the market and making love to him. To relieve her trouble, Gertrudis prepared her shower but it was a big task since she had to fill it with ten buckets of water and constantly climb up and down. While taking her shower, it caught on fire from her body heat. She then took cover running and got kidnapped by Juan, a captain of the rebel army, which later became her husband. Comparably, the film captures almost the exact scenario to show the main scene. It shows Pedro giving the bouquet and how the blood dripped once the throne pricked her skin.  Once everyone was eating, the more they ate, the higher the arousal became and sexual tension grew between Pedro and Tita.  However, the scene quickly goes to Gertrudis taking a shower but does not show the process of preparing her shower. It also did not show her body heat causing the shower to catch fire.  It skips to Juan taking her away on a horse. In the book, it states, “…the sexual desire Juan had contained for so long while he was fighting in the mountains, made for a spectacular encounter” (44). The book makes it seem sensual, while the film makes it seem like a kidnap.  
  2. The filmmaker uses low key lighting when filming romantic or dramatic scenes. Low-key lighting is an effect that uses a hard light source to enhance the shadow of a person in a scene. The hard light source is often bright and it brings attention to a specific part of the scene. In the film, after Tita was done cooking and cleaning, she was putting away her pots and pans and returning them to the storage room, while holding an oil lamp. She noticed someone else’s presence, which was Pedro. He extinguished the lamp, without saying anything and they made love. The light of the lamp drew attention to both Tita and Pedro’s shadow for dramatization. 
  3. In the novel, Esquivel shows the emotional, and vivid imaginations that each female character feels. In chapter 1, the author describes Tita’s emotions when she discovered Pedro will be marrying Rosuara: “…her body fill with a wintry chill: in one sharp, quick blast she was so cold and dry her cheeks burned and turned red, read ad the apples beside her” (20).  Another example is in chapter 7 when Tita bumped into John and felt a sense of comfort when he held her: “Tita was beginning to wonder if the feeling of peace and security that Dr. Brown gave her wasn’t true love, and not the agitation and anxiety she felt… with Pedro” (118). On the contrary, in the film, Arau captures more of the sexual aspect of the story. With Gertrudis feeling aroused during dinner and Pedro just wanting sex with Tita.

Tita’s character develops when she sacrificed her voice and not talking for six months. This was because Roberto, Pedro’s son, died and the news was so devastating for her that he because mentally distraught. Dr. Brown found her and took her to his place to help her recover. She felt comfortable at the home and she never wanted to go home and deal with motherly torture. During her stay, she felt numb to the situation and never spoke. Until Gertrudis brought Tita a nostalgic oxtail soup that she loves. Her sacrifice gained her the self-confidence that she never had for years while taking the abuse and emotional stress from her mother, Elena. When trying to speak her mind and have a say in a conversation, Elena aggressively disapproves of everything and curses Tita unnecessarily. To keep in mind, after dealing with the stress from childhood, having this transition is what she needed.

Towards the ending of both the story and film, Mama Elena dies from overdose and things are starting to look good for Tita after 20 years. She gets engaged with Dr. Brown and they plan on married. Gertrudis marries Juan and becomes more outspoken and confident with who she is. Pedro and Rosaura gave birth to Esperanza, Tita’s grand-niece, despite his never-ending love her Tita. After the engagement party for Tita and Dr. Brown, Tita and Pedro decide to consummate their love and forget what others think, leaving Dr. Brown to no longer wanting to marry her. When they finished Pedro dies and Tita kills herself while imagining her and Pedro embracing and their spirits being together forever.

 

First Draft of Midterm Essay

Laura Esquivel, Like Water for Chocolate (1992) and Alfonso Arau’s Like Water for Chocolate (1993)

 

Laura Esquirel’s novel, “Like Water for Chocolate,” is about a protagonist named Tita de la Garza, who faces various of hardships personally while maintaining the kitchen as Head cook for the family. With the abuse and intimation from her mother, the first antagonist, Mama Elena, and her desired lover, the second antagonist, Pedro, she finds difficulty finding the middle ground of it all. With every chapter, follows up with each month of the year and delicious recipes that correlates with the plot. In the film, Like Water for Chocolate by Alfonso Arau, it is very similar to the novel, however, it shows the main points of the story of Tita. According to Linda Cahir’s literature-to-film translations, traditional translation can be identified when comparing and contrasting the two versions. From watching the film after reading the novel, it maintained the overall plot, settings of the novel, but reconstructed certain details that filmmakers sees as necessary and fitting for the viewers.   

Every main character in the novel plays an important role in Tita’s life. She is the youngest daughter of the 4 sisters. She loves cooking and creating recipes with the cook of the house, Nacha for the family, due to her being born in the kitchen. She’s denied marriage because of Elena’s “family tradition:” the youngest child must not be married and take care of the mother until she dies. Although she follows this tradition, she’s introduced to a young man name Pedro who he seeks interest in marriage and unphatom love starts to create. Mama Elena is the mother who belittles and abuse Tita for the most simplest thing. Shes the head of the household and struggles to find peace with herself. Elena is the hardest roadblock for Tita to be with the man of her life. Pedro is seeks interest in Tita but marries Rosaura, Elena’s eldest daughter. He’s often becomes selfish, jealous, and possessive of Tita, in efforts to regain Tita’s love assurance. 

 

When comparing and contrasting, I will be using some terms when analyzing the film and novel: Tension, Backlighting, Transition, etc

  • The filmmaker and author uses different tension to illtrsute the important drama that occurs in Tita’s life.
  • In the film, filmmaker uses a lot of backlighting when showing romantic scenes between P and T. 
  •  The film uses a lot of choppy transitions when going into another event.  

Coffeehouse #2

A place I know in a great deal is my building in Queens. 6 stories, a red-brick building that looks very old. Brown-burgundy doors that need to either be replaced or repainted, with a primer this time. As you enter the lobby, you will see old, dingy black and white checkered tiles, that bleach could not make the white bright. Lights are relatively bright, shining yellow light. There are matching mirrors on both sides of the walls with gold trimming. When you walk in, to your right, there are stairs that lead to five apartment doors. Next to it, there is a small section for the mailbox and a place to drop off packages at. It was recently updated by USPS, about time. To your left is the elevator that is seriously in need of renovation, and next to the elevator there is another set of stairs that led to five more apartments. Going up to the elevator and reach the fifth floor where I live, there are four apartments on your right, two in the middle, and another four apartments on the left. In my living room, two windows overlook the backyard of my building. One of the windows has a fire escape stairs on it and I always see birds and squirrels eating on it, enjoying the breeze and food. On the other side, there is another building that my landlord owns, and it looks identical to my building. Some windows are damaged due to Hurricane Sandy that happened in 2012. You mainly see big, crooked trees sway back. Grass that needs mowing and trash that residents throw through their windows, need to be picked up. You can also see a street that many schools buses drive at. My old middle school and a house are on the same side as the street. Nothing too exciting to see

What happened with the wife and where did she go?

How did Mr. Thorwald know where to look?

Film-Lit Coffeehouse Assignment #1

I was supposed to go on a cruise in March and travel to Miami and California but of course, COVID happened, so everything got shut down. I spent every day cooking recipes that I found on Tik Tok and spending money on Amazon after watching Tik Tok reviews. Spending time at home during isolation was beneficial because it made me cook more, spend time with family more, and made me do a good deep house cleaning. I also enjoyed being in the house until May came, and I was over it all and to wear a mask every time you go outside, despite the extreme heat and humidity. It was annoying.

 

I liked “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Yellow Wallpaper.” The Tell-Tale Heart gave you eerie, some-what unpredictable turning points, and vivid imagining. The evil eye of the old man was such a problem to the narrator that the only way to relieve his problem was to kill the man. The way the narrator described how many times he just looked at the old man whenever he opened the door to how he plotted his murder continued to be more dramatic and gave you a vivid picture while reading. The Yellow Wallpaper was relatable and made you feel sympathetic as well as gives you a vivid imagination whenever she describes the room and how it affects her emotions and thoughts. It seems that the narrator is going through postpartum anxiety and only she will understand how exhausting and depressing it makes her feel. The husband seems passive-aggressive towards her feelings and made her feel less than. He keeps bringing up his job as physican, which was irrelevant. When reading both stories, the year I’m imagining that it took place in the 1800s and 1900s, due to its vintage word-play when describing a feeling that they feel.