This article talks about a subject that has interested me for a long time. How often are science research incorrect or false. Could it be possible that scientist may sometimes corrupt or change their findings to please the public or possibly gain fame. In this Article, Brian Nosek questioned exactly that. He wanted to make sure that all research was reliable rather than altered in order gain attention, gain more funding or simply please the public with positive results rather than good ones. He wanted to ensure that these results were reliable. He had developed an a system that could help scientist keep a public journal that could be used to verify that scientist could stick to their findings, rather than switch or alter their results in favor of themselves. This system would keep a public log of their hypothesis, methods and findings. He also had a plan to redo about 50 experiments to verify their findings. He wanted question their findings and determine how many times these findings could be proven false. The project would be called  “The Reproducibility Project” and with the help of John  Arnold and the Laura and John Arnold foundation, he would determine that only 40% of the findings could be verified. As stated in the article, this would cause one of the biggest science stories and crisis among the field of science and psychology. John Arnold and his foundation helped Brian Nosek with his research with a grants of 5.25 million and up to 10 million more. This made it possible for Nosek to reach his goals.