Journal 1

Visit​ ​#1:​ ​N.S.​ ​28​ ​yr​ ​old​ ​female​ ​H/II​ ​localized​ ​III.​ ​Date​ ​of​ ​Service:​ ​10/10/17

ASSESSMENT:  Pt​ ​does​ ​not​ ​require​ ​any​ ​premedication.Vital​ ​signs​ ​all​ ​within​ ​normal​ ​limits. Pt​ ​has​ ​a​ ​history​ ​of​ ​polycystic​ ​ovary​ ​syndrome. Pt​ ​is​ ​not​ ​taking​ ​any​ ​medications.
ORAL​ ​PATHOLOGY: None,​ ​EOIO​ ​WNL.
DENTITION Patient​ ​had​ ​no​ ​attrition,​ ​erosion,​ ​abfraction​ ​or​ ​abrasion​ ​to​ ​note. No​ ​tooth​ ​abnormalities​ ​observed​ ​during​ ​assessment. No​ ​caries​ ​detected​ ​clinically​ ​or​ ​radiographically.
PERIODONTAL 1. Pt​ ​gingiva​ ​has​ ​melanin​ ​pigmentation.​ ​Stippling​ ​present.​ ​Rolled​ ​gingival​ ​margins​ ​noted​ ​in the​ ​molar​ ​areas. 2. Pt​ ​was​ ​found​ ​to​ ​be​ ​a​ ​type​ ​II​ ​localized​ ​type​ ​III.​ ​Probing​ ​depths​ ​of​ ​1-6mm​ ​with​ ​moderate BUP.​ ​Bone​ ​loss​ ​evident​ ​on​ ​radiographs​ ​around​ ​first​ ​molars​ ​both​ ​maxillary​ ​and mandibular,​ ​classified​ ​as​ ​localized​ ​aggressive​ ​periodontitis. 3. Arestin​ ​would​ ​be​ ​appropriate​ ​for​ ​this​ ​patient​ ​in​ ​areas​ ​of​ ​deeper​ ​probing​ ​depths.
ORAL​ ​HYGIENE 1. Pt​ ​classified​ ​as​ ​Heavy​ ​case​ ​based​ ​on​ ​generalized​ ​heavy​ ​subgingival​ ​calculus,​ ​also evident​ ​on​ ​radiographs. 2. Methods​ ​used​ ​to​ ​assess​ ​the​ ​patient’s​ ​oral​ ​hygiene​ ​was​ ​conversation​ ​about​ ​her​ ​daily​ ​oral hygiene​ ​routine​ ​at​ ​home,​ ​and​ ​speaking​ ​about​ ​how​ ​often​ ​she​ ​has​ ​visited​ ​the​ ​dentist.​ ​This patient​ ​was​ ​not​ ​from​ ​this​ ​country​ ​and​ ​had​ ​never​ ​been​ ​to​ ​a​ ​dentist,​ ​so​ ​it​ ​was​ ​a​ ​great conversation​ ​to​ ​educate​ ​her​ ​on​ ​the​ ​importance​ ​of​ ​home​ ​care​ ​and​ ​regular​ ​scheduled check​ ​ups. 3. PI​ ​Score:​ ​.8
RADIOGRAPHS 1. FMS​ ​was​ ​exposed​ ​because​ ​the​ ​patient​ ​had​ ​generalized​ ​sensitivity​ ​on​ ​probing​ ​and​ ​had never​ ​had​ ​any​ ​type​ ​of​ ​dental​ ​radiograph​ ​done​ ​before. 2. The​ ​radiographs​ ​showed​ ​bone​ ​loss​ ​in​ ​multiple​ ​areas,​ ​mostly​ ​on​ ​first​ ​molars​ ​and​ ​calculus was​ ​evident​ ​on​ ​the​ ​radiographs​ ​as​ ​well.
3. Clinically​ ​we​ ​were​ ​not​ ​able​ ​to​ ​diagnose​ ​localized​ ​aggressive​ ​periodontitis​ ​because​ ​we did​ ​not​ ​have​ ​the​ ​radiographs.​ ​Once​ ​exposed​ ​we​ ​could​ ​classify​ ​the​ ​pt​ ​with​ ​localized aggressive​ ​periodontitis.
OTHER​ ​FINDINGS 1. Pt​ ​is​ ​a​ ​non​ ​smoker,​ ​and​ ​does​ ​not​ ​drink. 2. Pt​ ​had​ ​never​ ​been​ ​to​ ​a​ ​dentist​ ​so​ ​there​ ​was​ ​some​ ​dental​ ​anxiety,​ ​which​ ​subsided​ ​as​ ​we continued​ ​with​ ​our​ ​visits​ ​and​ ​as​ ​I​ ​continued​ ​to​ ​educate​ ​her​ ​as​ ​to​ ​why​ ​we​ ​were​ ​doing what​ ​we​ ​were​ ​doing.
TREATMENT​ ​MANAGEMENT​ ​​ ​during​ ​each​ ​visit:

VISIT​ ​1:​ ​​ ​Discussed​ ​and​ ​recommended​ ​4​ ​quadrant​ ​scaling​ ​and​ ​exposing​ ​FMS.​ ​OHI​ ​tooth brushing​ ​with​ ​the​ ​modified​ ​bass​ ​brushing​ ​technique​ ​and​ ​the​ ​addition​ ​of​ ​an​ ​antiseptic​ ​mouth rinse.​ ​Teeth​ ​#’s​ ​25,26​ ​and​ ​27​ ​were​ ​scaled​ ​using​ ​hand​ ​instrumentation​ ​and​ ​ultrasonic.​ ​Pt​ ​was experiencing​ ​discomfort,​ ​so​ ​we​ ​discussed​ ​the​ ​use​ ​of​ ​local​ ​anesthetic​ ​for​ ​visit​ ​2.

VISIT​ ​2:​ ​Reassessed​ ​teeth​ ​3’s​ ​25-27.​ ​Exposed​ ​FMS.​ ​Dr.​ ​Ekelman​ ​administered​ ​2 carpules​ ​of​ ​Lidocaine​ ​HCI​ ​2%​ ​and​ ​Epi​ ​1:100,000​ ​via​ ​local​ ​infiltration​ ​on​ ​the​ ​LRQ.​ ​OHI​ ​flossing with​ ​waxed​ ​floss​ ​and​ ​discussed​ ​the​ ​use​ ​of​ ​floss​ ​holders.​ ​Scaled​ ​the​ ​LRQ​ ​using​ ​hand instrumentation​ ​and​ ​ultrasonic.​ ​Severe​ ​bleeding​ ​on​ ​the​ ​molar​ ​areas.​ ​Tx​ ​plan​ ​was​ ​modified​ ​to more​ ​sessions​ ​due​ ​to​ ​the​ ​severity​ ​of​ ​the​ ​pt’s​ ​condition.

VISIT​ ​3:​ ​Pt​ ​stated​ ​that​ ​her​ ​“gums​ ​were​ ​a​ ​little​ ​sore.”​ ​Advised​ ​pt​ ​to​ ​take​ ​ibuprofen​ ​post visit​ ​if​ ​needed.​ ​Dr.​ ​Ekelman​ ​administered​ ​1​ ​carpule​ ​of​ ​Lidocaine​ ​HCI​ ​2%​ ​and​ ​Epi​ ​1:100,000​ ​via local​ ​infiltration​ ​on​ ​the​ ​LRQ.​ ​Scaled​ ​the​ ​LRQ​ ​to​ ​completion​ ​using​ ​hand​ ​instrumentation​ ​and ultrasonic.​ ​Professor​ ​Spielman​ ​administered​ ​1​ ​carpule​ ​of​ ​Lidocaine​ ​HCI​ ​2%​ ​and​ ​Epi​ ​1:100,000 via​ ​local​ ​infiltration​ ​to​ ​the​ ​URQ.​ ​Scaled​ ​the​ ​URQ​ ​to​ ​completion​ ​using​ ​hand​ ​instrumentation​ ​and ultrasonic.

VISIT​ ​4:​ ​Reassessed​ ​URQ​ ​and​ ​LRQ.​ ​Professor​ ​Fernandez​ ​administered​ ​1​ ​carpule​ ​of Lidocaine​ ​HCI​ ​2%​ ​and​ ​Epi​ ​1:100,000​ ​via​ ​local​ ​infiltration​ ​to​ ​the​ ​LLQ.​ ​Removed​ ​residual​ ​calculus from​ ​URQ​ ​and​ ​LRQ.​ ​Scaled​ ​the​ ​LLQ​ ​to​ ​completion​ ​using​ ​hand​ ​instrumentation​ ​and​ ​ultrasonic. Professor​ ​Spielman​ ​administered​ ​1​ ​carpule​ ​of​ ​Lidocaine​ ​HCI​ ​2%​ ​and​ ​Epi​ ​1:100,000​ ​via​ ​local infiltration​ ​to​ ​the​ ​ULQ.​ ​Scaled​ ​the​ ​ULQ​ ​to​ ​completion​ ​using​ ​hand​ ​instrumentation​ ​and​ ​ultrasonic. Rubber​ ​cup​ ​polish​ ​with​ ​fine​ ​grit​ ​paste​ ​and​ ​applied​ ​fluoride​ ​varnish.​ ​Post​ ​operative​ ​instructions given​ ​to​ ​pt.​ ​Patient​ ​placed​ ​on​ ​a​ ​3​ ​month​ ​recare.
2.​ ​For​ ​the​ ​deeper​ ​pockets​ ​and​ ​bleeding​ ​of​ ​the​ ​gingiva​ ​recommended​ ​a​ ​chemotherapeutic​ ​mouth rinse.​ ​During​ ​OHI​ ​the​ ​pt​ ​stated​ ​she​ ​did​ ​not​ ​like​ ​to​ ​put​ ​her​ ​hands​ ​in​ ​her​ ​mouth​ ​and​ ​that​ ​it​ ​was hard​ ​to​ ​reach​ ​her​ ​back​ ​teeth​ ​so​ ​we​ ​discussed​ ​the​ ​use​ ​of​ ​floss​ ​holders.​ ​Pt​ ​liked​ ​the​ ​floss​ ​picks and​ ​said​ ​they​ ​were​ ​easier​ ​to​ ​use.
3.​ ​Pt​ ​was​ ​given​ ​a​ ​referral​ ​for​ ​DDS​ ​for​ ​general​ ​check​ ​up​ ​and​ ​also​ ​to​ ​see​ ​a​ ​periodontist​ ​to​ ​address the​ ​localized​ ​aggressive​ ​periodontitis.

EVALUATION A. Pt​ ​seemed​ ​to​ ​respond​ ​well​ ​to​ ​the​ ​interventions​ ​of​ ​the​ ​past​ ​visits.​ ​She​ ​said​ ​that​ ​she​ ​has felt​ ​a​ ​difference​ ​between​ ​visits​ ​of​ ​the​ ​quadrants​ ​that​ ​were​ ​scaled​ ​and​ ​that​ ​we​ ​still​ ​needed to​ ​scale.​ ​She​ ​said​ ​they​ ​bled​ ​less​ ​and​ ​felt​ ​better. B. The​ ​pt​ ​seemed​ ​extremely​ ​interested​ ​in​ ​her​ ​oral​ ​health​ ​once​ ​I​ ​educated​ ​her​ ​on​ ​her​ ​current condition​ ​and​ ​what​ ​we​ ​would​ ​have​ ​to​ ​do​ ​as​ ​treatment​ ​to​ ​restore​ ​oral​ ​health.​ ​Having​ ​the radiographs​ ​and​ ​explaining​ ​the​ ​findings​ ​were​ ​good​ ​tools​ ​to​ ​educate​ ​the​ ​patient. C. The​ ​gingival​ ​tissue​ ​showed​ ​signs​ ​of​ ​healing​ ​as​ ​the​ ​sessions​ ​continued.​ ​Bleeding decreased​ ​dramatically​ ​and​ ​inflammation​ ​reduced.
STUDENT​ ​REFLECTION: Reflecting​ ​on​ ​my​ ​clinical​ ​treatment​ ​and​ ​faculty​ ​feedback​ ​I​ ​felt​ ​like​ ​this​ ​was​ ​mostly​ ​a​ ​positive experience​ ​for​ ​me.​ ​My​ ​strengths​ ​in​ ​this​ ​particular​ ​pt​ ​case​ ​was​ ​taking​ ​time​ ​to​ ​educate​ ​the​ ​patient and​ ​my​ ​clinical​ ​skills​ ​as​ ​far​ ​as​ ​calculus​ ​detection​ ​and​ ​removal.​ ​Faculty​ ​mentioned​ ​to​ ​me​ ​that​ ​this was​ ​a​ ​very​ ​difficult​ ​case​ ​and​ ​I​ ​think​ ​my​ ​time​ ​management​ ​and​ ​scaling​ ​skills​ ​were​ ​very​ ​good.​ ​I also​ ​appreciated​ ​that​ ​the​ ​patient​ ​needed​ ​more​ ​time​ ​with​ ​explaining​ ​what​ ​we​ ​were​ ​doing​ ​as english​ ​was​ ​not​ ​her​ ​first​ ​language.​ ​I​ ​believe​ ​that​ ​I​ ​made​ ​the​ ​pt​ ​very​ ​comfortable​ ​as​ ​she​ ​had never​ ​been​ ​to​ ​the​ ​dentist​ ​and​ ​had​ ​never​ ​been​ ​anesthetized.​ ​I​ ​talked​ ​her​ ​through​ ​step​ ​by​ ​step what​ ​we​ ​were​ ​doing​ ​and​ ​why​ ​we​ ​were​ ​doing​ ​it.​ ​​ ​I​ ​think​ ​this​ ​calmed​ ​her​ ​and​ ​made​ ​her​ ​more secure​ ​in​ ​my​ ​abilities​ ​to​ ​treat​ ​her.
I​ ​don’t​ ​believe​ ​I​ ​had​ ​any​ ​specific​ ​weakness​ ​in​ ​this​ ​case,​ ​but​ ​this​ ​particular​ ​case​ ​made​ ​me​ ​more knowledgeable​ ​of​ ​localized​ ​aggressive​ ​periodontitis.​ ​Having​ ​the​ ​experience​ ​of​ ​speaking​ ​with​ ​Dr. Ekelman​ ​and​ ​discussing​ ​in​ ​more​ ​detail​ ​the​ ​specifics​ ​of​ ​the​ ​disease​ ​helped​ ​me​ ​understand​ ​more about​ ​it​ ​as​ ​well​ ​as​ ​treatment.