The authors of these essays envisioned technology as having the potential to rule the whole planet. For instance, Marinetti (n.d.) stated that rather than turning to history and seeking a unifying factor in the great names of historical events, the diversity of future cultures must and should be founded on the transformative aesthetics of the machine speed battle. On the other hand, Rodchenko et al. (1922) say that the future would be so fantastic and simple since everything will be automated. The writers of these pieces speculated on the role of technology in influencing global conflict. Through technology, individuals will be able to create a variety of weaponry that will aid them in defeating their adversaries during the conflict. Additionally, they imagined that technology would impact almost every element of life, from transportation effectiveness and reliability to dietary and healthcare availability, sociability, and creativity.

The artists expected the art and design that would follow by employing creativity and imagination that provides comfort, conversation, and encouragement to their neighborhoods and offers thoughtful critiques of theĀ political, economic, and societal structures, encouraging communities to engage thoughtfully and take steps toward social progress. The writers can forecast the future of art and design by observing how people react to offered concepts on embracing social changes.
What common views do these authors share?
The authors of these articles have a common view on social change. The authors of these three articles believe that there will be advancements in technology in the future where people will enjoy the benefits of technology.

The writers’ views on the development of imagined art may differ. For instance, Lissitzky’s (1926) painting illustrates that throughout time, various versions on the same topic are created around the innovation, sometimes more sharply defined, sometimes more flatly defined, but rarely achieving the initial force. On the other hand, Rodchenko et al. (1922) and Marinetti (n.d.) both support the development of art and design innovation.

These texts relevant to the present are the evolution of technology and i innovation’s most problematic element of these articles is that they were published many decades ago. Therefore, they may not be resourceful when relating to the current world.