Aaron Hollander_Project 2 – Revised Final

One Response to Aaron Hollander_Project 2 – Revised Final

1. Jill Bouratoglou says:

   May 24, 2014 at 9:42 am

   Comments:
   Your concept is very strong in the massing – the corrugated planes intersecting, but it is not seen at any other level – furniture layout, floor plans, ceilings, lights…

   Floor plans – the flow works, but it would be more successful if the angled planes showed throughout the plans. The tables and seating are very generic – not related to the concept. Were they meatballs??? weak link

   Building sections are exciting, but that is because of the angled planes – beside that there is nothing else continuing through to the design. Everything is light and hard to read.
   Elevations – the long elevation is great, but the front needs work/studies. It appears short and wide – not dynamic with the angled plans. there could be planes that come up from the ground to create the entrance. The entrance should be celebrated with your concept.
   RCP- The lights do not look like that belong to the intertwined mixed up bowl of pasta. They are all in the same family – industrial, metal – but is there something that could have happened at the ceiling plane to repeat at a different scale your concept?
   Hope these comments help strengthen your project.

   Reply