Tag Archives: mainstream vs. independent

Assignment 2B

I believe that there is bias on everything. The media tries to focus so much on one side. A lot of news channels like Fox News, CNN, etc. tend to lean towards one side. You don’t really get an opinion on both of the sides of the story. Currently the news has been focused on presidential campaigns, especially focusing on Donald Trump and all his opinions about immigrants. Corporate Interest affects the information that we receive in another alternative. As we receive information from one another, it could be either biased or unbiased.  It depends on what kind of news (ex: Abc 7, Fox 5) or a source that we receive the information from. The media is trying to persuade us from one individual to another with their opinion, it may be spread around with different answers as a positive or negative sign on one topic. People believe that everything that they see or hear on a news channel is reliable information. The media wants us to believe that everything we see is true and they try to  persuade us into changing the way we view certain things.

Information that we receive being it bias or not has the effect of corporate interest. The media companies, due to their corporate interest to gain, sometimes changes the true meaning of the information being send across. Some sources try to make others look good, while others try to make them look bad. Certain media will make sure Donald Trump is looked as a “actual” good candidate but that is bad bias behavior for the people. Since Donald Trump has so much control, he can control the information that is put out there with the power of money to make him look good. Regardless the presidential campaign is for the people, and should stay for the people, so they should be given the right bias information in the media.

In response to the article, “Critical Thinking, Deviant Knowledge and the Alternative Press”, written by Thomas Eland in a newsletter in December 2004 for the Minneapolis Community and Technical College, I agree with the author’s assessment of the necessity for having more of an alternative press assessed view of the world in order to have a more balanced, and well-informed society. In turn this would create more of a democratic, more “hands-on” approach in making decisions dealing with our government.

I confirm that the manner in which the media is now set up is biased, simply because it only offers a one-sided view of their corporations’ interest collaborated with the interest of the major advertisers. An example of alternative news vs. mainstream media is written in an article, “These Students are Leading a Movement for Free College in the United States”, written by Rebecca Nathanson for Act Locally on November 15, 2015. The article is shown on the website www.inthesetimes.com. This article addresses the fight for Americans to go to college for free, and how Bernie Sanders has taken up this cause. I have not heard about this in mainstream media. The mainstream media didn’t really talk about this.

 

Assignment 2B

Corporations have been influencing news sources for many years to only feed us information that will benefit them. If a big corporation decides to buy out an independent news source, they can persuade journalists to change their wording to only speak in their favor. This lets a lot of big corporations get away with a lot of injustices as the journalists write about only their accomplishments and the little good deeds that they may do for the local communities. The article I read as an example “Could A Small Nuclear War Reverse Global Warming?”  was published by the Huffington Post. The Huffington Post was purchased by AOL. AOL has also purchased many other corporations in the past as well. The article defends the use of Nuclear weapons and states that it can be beneficial to the environment. They vaguely talk about how it has killed many people in the past. A mainstream new source would  not defend the use of nuclear weapons.

Blog Assignment #2B

The news we hear daily comes from big corporations and this information can be skew depending on the corporate’s interest. Corporate bias news are stories that are selected or slanted to please corporate owners in the media world. The news and stories will emphasize one point of view instead of providing ethical journalism which is unbiased.

Looking at an article in therealnews.com which is an independent news source, we can see how this news is covered differently by mainstream news sources. The article, ” Dakota Access Pipeline Protests Face Pepper Spray, Attack Dogs” by Jaisal Noor talks about how Energy Transfer Partners have a project to build a pipeline carrying crude oil daily from North Dakota to existing pipeline in Illinois, where shippers can access the markets.  Noor himself states, “While the mainstream media has been largely silent on this issue.” His statement talks about how only recently has mainstream media talked about the issue and it’s only because video caught guards using pepper spray and dogs against protesters. ABC News was the only mainstream news that wrote an article about this topic. ABS News article, “What is the Dakota Access Oil Pipeline” by The Associated Press does not inform about the protest, it mainly talks about the facts of the Dakota Pipeline. Noor talks about the actions and testimonies from both sides while The Associated Press talks about politicians and lawsuits.

 

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ap-explains-dakota-access-oil-pipeline-41969030

http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=17190