MLA Citation
Vemoori, Vamsi. “Council Post: Navigating The Ethical Dilemmas Of Self-Driving Cars: Who Decides When Safety Is At Risk?” Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2024/10/23/navigating-the-ethical-dilemmas-of-self-driving-cars-who-decides-when-safety-is-at-risk/. Accessed 30 Oct. 2024
Summary
In the article “Navigating The Ethical Dilemmas Of Self-Driving Cars: Who Decides When Safety Is At Risk?” Vemoori, Vamsi discusses the ethics of self-driving cars and the ethical considerations self-driving cars must navigate, including whose safety should be prioritized and the absence of a global standard for ethical programming. The article compares ethical issues like utilitarianism, which emphasizes the greatest good for the greatest number, with Kantian ethics, which values individual rights and safety. Accountability is also questioned, as traditional driver responsibility becomes unclear with autonomous technology. The article suggests a combined, global approach to address these issues. Other ethical concerns include privacy, algorithmic bias, and job displacement due to automation. Despite challenges, the article emphasizes that autonomous vehicles could reduce accidents and improve mobility, with a balanced approach to ethics, regulation, and innovation.
Rhetorical Analysis
The article’s intended audience likely includes technologists, ethicists, policymakers, and the general public interested in the future of autonomous technology. The purpose is to raise awareness and advocate for ethical and transparent development. This was written as an informative analysis, the article combines a formal and thoughtful tone with a call to action for collaborative efforts in setting ethical standards for autonomous vehicles. The article uses logos through factual data and ethical frameworks to explain moral trade-offs. It appeals to pathos by discussing real-life implications like privacy invasion and job loss, urging readers to consider the human impact of these technologies. The source is credible, given its engagement with multiple expert perspectives and its appeal for a balanced, regulated approach to autonomous vehicle ethics as well as Forbes being a credible source.
Notable Quotables
“Whose lives should the car prioritize? There’s no global ethical standard to govern such choices, leaving programmers to navigate murky moral waters.”( Vemoori, Vamsi)
“Kantian ethics takes a different approach, emphasizing the inherent dignity of human life. This perspective would argue that the car must not deliberately harm any person, even if swerving leads to an accident.” (Vemoori, Vamsi)
“Public engagement. Ethical debates about autonomous vehicles should be transparent and inclusive. The public deserves a voice in deciding how these cars should be programmed and which ethical principles they follow.” (Vemoori, Vamsi)
“Stricter regulations will be necessary to prevent misuse of the data these cars collect.” (Vemoori, Vamsi)
