Credit
NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY PICTURE COLLECTION / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
Caption: Sir Robert Boyle and his laboratory assistant Denis Papin, 1675.
I’m getting excited about this particular project; I have been thinking about how to structure my ideas since there is so much I have to say on my topic! The title of my talk is “Seeing Things: AI, Deep Fakes, Optics, and Vision, or How did the Enlightenment Predict our Dilemma?”
Here is my abstract:
We find ourselves at a moment in history when the fear of technology is palpable
everywhere. Debates about the value or danger of AI remind us of the early
enlightenment period, when often-heated arguments about the questionable
value and practicality of the inventions of machines designed to enhance vision
were challenged. How can we prove that what we are seeing is really there?
How far can we safely trust visual technology, especially considering the growing
presence of trickery like “deep fakes”? It is getting harder to tell the difference
between seeing things and “seeing things.” Naomi Klein writes: “hallucination
refers to the mysterious capacity of the human brain to perceive phenomena that
are not present, at least not in conventional, materialist terms […] by building
these large language models, and training them on everything that we humans
have written, said and represented visually, they are in the process of birthing an
animate intelligence on the cusp of sparking an evolutionary leap for our species.”
My paper will consider the ways in which 17-18th C experimental science, and the
emerging novel predicted this particularly human dilemma in which we now find
ourselves.