Monthly Archives: April 2016

Spring Break Reading Assignment

Hi All. Welcome to Spring Break.

Ok, now, three articles to read. You will write a “reflection” in your journals for us to discuss in class when we return.

The seeming subject is: The Donald — and also, a man named David Brooks, who wrote about him recently. Here you go:

Article number one, linked here: A NewYork Times Editorial by David Brooks

Article numbers two and three linked here and here: two pieces about Brooks by Slate magazine writers.

Really, the subject is: how what you feel about a person colors what they say.

Journal Reflection for next class, May 3:

Think and write a few sentences on the notion of what happens when someone you may not like says something that makes sense to you. Specifically: Slate’s feelings about Conservative journalist David Brooks.

Do you think that Brooks is a good writer? Do you think he sounds “unbalanced” in his NYTIMES opinion piece? What would you think about him, if you hadn’t read Slate?

Words you should briefly define, below, in your journal reflection:

What is misogyny? What is chivalry?  What is (loosely defined, here) feminism?

Enjoy!

Major Assignment Schedule for April and May

April 19: First Draft of Research Paper due. [You will not receive a grade on your Final Draft Paper if you do not submit a First Draft.]

April 21: Official National “Poem In Your Pocket Day”; assignments on how to participate given in class. (These will go in your Journal.)

SPRING BREAK April 22-May 1.

(check your email over the break, please, for comments from professor; check here on OpenLab for any readings assigned over break!)

May 3: Receive your First Draft from the professor. If you have not already discussed the comments, discuss them this week.

May 10: If you are one of the students asked to complete an Annotated Bibliography, it is due May 10.

May 13: Journal Check Day.

May 17: Final Draft of Research Paper due. Final Exam sheet distributed to take hom.

May 19: Final Exam

May 24: Last Day Party

What is “An Annotated Bibliography”?

A number of you may be asked to not only do a regular bibliography, but also to annotate your bibliography. If you are asked to do this, it is due May 10. (The Professor will read your First Draft papers first, and then reach out to you via email or in person to tell you.)

Here is information Online, published by Cornell University. You may find it helpful. You can also visit the link directly here:

WHAT IS AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY?

An annotated bibliography is a list of citations to books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the annotation. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.

ANNOTATIONS VS. ABSTRACTS

Abstracts are the purely descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in periodical indexes. Annotations are descriptive and critical; they expose the author’s point of view, clarity and appropriateness of expression, and authority.

THE PROCESS

Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct analysis, and informed library research.

First, locate and record citations to books, periodicals, and documents that may contain useful information and ideas on your topic. Briefly examine and review the actual items. Then choose those works that provide a variety of perspectives on your topic.

Cite the book, article, or document using the appropriate style.

Write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. Include one or more sentences that (a) evaluate the authority or background of the author, (b) comment on the intended audience, (c) compare or contrast this work with another you have cited, or (d) explain how this work illuminates your bibliography topic.

CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE BOOK, ARTICLE, OR DOCUMENT

For guidance in critically appraising and analyzing the sources for your bibliography, see How to Critically Analyze Information Sources. For information on the author’s background and views, ask at the reference desk for help finding appropriate biographical reference materials and book review sources.

CHOOSING THE CORRECT FORMAT FOR THE CITATIONS

Check with your instructor to find out which style is preferred for your class. Online citation guides for both the Modern Language Association (MLA) and the American Psychological Association (APA) styles are linked from the Library’s Citation Management page.

SAMPLE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ENTRY FOR A JOURNAL ARTICLE

The following example uses the APA format for the journal citation.

Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 541-554.

The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.

This example uses the MLA format for the journal citation. NOTE: Standard MLA practice requires double spacing within citations.

Waite, Linda J., Frances Kobrin Goldscheider, and Christina Witsberger. “Nonfamily Living and the Erosion of Traditional Family Orientations Among Young Adults.” American Sociological Review 51.4 (1986): 541-554. Print.

The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.

 

Your Assigned Reading from April 8

(copied from “Assignments,” above. Am reposting it here.)

April 8: Here is your next reading, in pdf format. Please extract three quotes from it that you find most inspiring. Type and print them yourself on paper. Paste the paper near you desk/workspace/where you will see them all the time. Show me a photo of where you posted the paper.

These two chapters are excerpted from a larger book on what it’s really like to be a fiction writer. Hope you enjoy — even though you are not writing fiction, you are writing fact!:

http://engl210-picetti.wikispaces.umb.edu/file/view/Lamott_Bird+by+Bird.pdf

George Orwell says…Don’t Drink and Think (well, sort of)

People wonder why English departments are such sticklers for grammar and the like. I’ll tell you honestly that, as a teacher, it’s not easy to uphold SWE (Standard Written English) when people (real people, my good friends, my respected colleagues) don’t really speak it themselves. Most people in an urban environment speak some version of what I think of as a “dialect” of Standard English. Call it AAVE, Ebonics, Slang, or whatever you want to, given the situation. No matter what you call it, the term will sound like you’re talking down to the speaker, and that’s not kind, not good. It doesn’t let that person be heard.

Now that we’ve said that, I still have to grade papers. Lots of them. And I have to convey to my students why it’s important that they write in SWE to the best of their ability. One of the better arguments I’ve found is that of “consistency.” If you conform to a standard, your concepts and innovations can be adopted faster.

Here is what one famous writer had to say about why people aren’t speaking English well anymore. And he wrote this at least 75 years ago!:

A man may take to drink because he feels himself to be a failure, and then fail all the more completely because he drinks. It is rather the same thing that is happening to the English language. It becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts. The point is that the process is reversible. Modern English, especially written English, is full of bad habits which spread by imitation and which can be avoided if one is willing to take the necessary trouble. If one gets rid of these habits one can think more clearly, and to think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration: so that the fight against bad English is not frivolous and is not the exclusive concern of professional writers.

–from “POLITICS AND THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE” BY GEORGE ORWELL

Thoughts? Accuracy is important. And it can be fun to be accurate, and to enforce accuracy in others…

George_Orwell_press_photo

(George Orwell, pictured above. He wrote Animal Farm, and 1984.)


A reminder: My Office Hour is Thursdays, 10:45AM – 11:45 AM in the Common Room near the Library, Atrium, 4th Flr.