Professor Scanlan's OpenLab Course Site

Author: Mehriniso Muhammadieva

Final Draft-Midterm Essay

Mehriniso Muhammadieva

CST 2400

10/20/2020

Final Draft-Midterm Essay  

 

Laura Esquirel’s, Like Water for Chocolate, is almost like a modern-day Romeo and Juliet that are filled with appetizing recipes. This novel was published in 1983 and has become one of the valued parts of American literature. The novel’s publicity and fame then brought this movie to life on February 17, 1993, by Alfonso Arau. While the novel, Like Water for Chocolate, is similar to Alfonso Arau’s film version; there are also some distinguishable differences. The use of diegetic and non-diegetic sound makes this translation literal, according to Linda Cahir’s definition. In order to provide this, I will explore the narrators’ description of the scenes. Second, I will use the film’s use of diegetic and non-diegetic sounds to show actions. Lastly, I will discuss what the film has that the book does not. 

The novel and the film is a lateral transition due to the fact that the plot is there and the film does an amazing job recapturing the novel’s description. There are some distinct differences that are hard to recognize. The use of diegetic and non-diegetic sounds in the film and the novel is also the reason the transition is literal, both follow the same concept; which is the use of sound in the film/novel or outside the film/novel throughout the film/novel. From the day Tita was born on the kitchen table her life was planned out for her by Mama Elena. Therefore, Tita was always a rebel, she went against the rules and fell in love. However,  Mama Elena does not allow it by saying, “You know perfectly well that being the youngest daughter means you have to take care of me until the day I die.”(1,22). Tita goes through so much sadness and grief as she loses the people she cares for and cherishes. Tita is shown to have a strong character, no matter what she goes through she always has the will to be kind and forgive and live out her life breaking this tradition her mother passed on for the happiness of her niece.

What makes the film and the movie literal is the use of the plot and a few differences. As a reader/ viewer, we see the similarities throughout the film/ novel. For example, the scene where Tita is leaving with Dr. John and the hand-sewn “wail’ or rather her bedspread is left being dragged for miles. This similarity is iconic due to the fact the reader can clearly picture this and the viewer can see the same exact thing. What Arau does differently in the film is interesting, because it is barely noticeable but it is there. For example, the death of Mama Elena; in the novel, we have her dying of poisoning. What Arau does is add more action to the film by having Mama Elena die earlier during the attack; Mama Elena dies by being pushed off a cliff by the bandits.

First Draft-Midterm Essay!

Mehriniso Muhammadieva

CST 2400

10/20/2020

First Draft-Midterm Essay

 

Laura Esquirel’s, Like Water for Chocolate, is almost like a modern-day Romeo and Juliet that are filled with appetizing recipes. This novel was published in 1983 and has become one of the valued parts of American literature. The novel’s publicity and fame then brought this movie to life on February 17, 1993, by Alfonso Arau. While the novel, Like Water for Chocolate, is similar to Alfonso Arau’s film version; there are also some distinguishable differences. The use of diegetic and non-diegetic sound makes this translation literal, according to Linda Cahir’s definition. In order to provide this, I will explore the narrators’ description of the scenes. Second, I will use the film’s use of diegetic and non-diegetic sounds to show actions. Lastly, I will discuss what the film has that the book does not. 

The main novel begins with Tita, the main character, coming to life in the kitchen and filling the floor with the tide of tears; maybe because she knew that she would be denied marriage to her loved one. Tita is a character of talent and full of romance; Tita’s life is fully controlled by Mama Elena; what she does, whom she talks to, and whom she marries. However, Tita’s future is set up right after she was born to not get married and her task is to simply take care of Mama Elene for the rest of her life. We also have the older sisters of Tita; Rosaura and Gertrudis, Rosaura ends up marrying Tita’s lover and has his children, Esperanza and Roberto. Gertrudis is the first rebel of the De La Garza family, wanting to escape the securities of home, she is overwhelmed by her lustful passion. She ends up running away with a soldier bare naked and ends up becoming the chief. We also have Nacha, she is an important person to Tita, basically her mother figure. Nacha is the one that takes care of Tita from birth, she is always three when Tita is in need of help; her death becomes Tita’s great grief. We have Chencha, Tita’s best friend and companion throughout the film and the movie. Lastly, we have Pedro, Tita’s lover, and Rosaura’s husband. Pedro marries Rosaura to get close to Tita, as a result, Tita suffers tremendously; she becomes an insomniac, where she wastes her nights kneading it. 

When looking at the similarities and differences between the movie and the film one can barely find the differences because one, the movie goes by really fast. Second, Arau did a good job of recapturing Esquirel’s words/imaginations that it is almost impossible to see the difference. One of the similarities in the diegetic sound that is used both in the novel and the film. Throughout the novel, we have Tita telling the readers how she is feeling, and also we have communication between the characters in the novel. Arue does the same thing with the film, we have characters talking to each other and the sounds that are made in the kitchen, the ranch, we also have Tita’s voice as she speaks her mind to us only. That sound is the only thing the other characters do get to hear both in the film and the novel. One small difference we have is the beginning of the film where we see the death of Tita’s father, while in the novel we are automatically in the scene of Mama Elena giving birth to Tita. Another difference would be the death of Mama Elena in the novel. We have Mama Elena die of poisoning herself with massive doses of ipecac. While in the movie we have her die right when the revolutionaries attack the ranch and throw Mama Elena off to a cliff.

Coffeehouse #3

Alfred Hitchcock’s film “Rear Window”, leads Cornell Woolrich’s short story “It Had to Be Murder” to life, and somehow parts to the storyline fit differently. One of the major differences that struck out to me between the film and the story is the visual aspect of the character in the film; I knew that Jeff is a mysterious, unshakable, and intelligent man that ends up solving a murder.  Also in the film, we know about his love life, his occupation, and the story behind his disability. However, in the story, while reading the beginning, I automatically thought that Jeff was an old man that is unable to walk. Additionally, we do not know anything about Jeff from reading the story, all we know is his name and that he is unable to walk; we do not know his job, his love life, the story behind his disability. Another major difference was the caretaker. In the story we have Sam, who is really obedient;  we know that he is able to jump over fences and climb ladders without a question. On the other hand, we have Stella, who is Jeff’s caretaker; we know that she comes in every morning to change his clothes and give him a massage (plus she is really talkative unlike Sam). Other minor differences we see is Jeff’s view of the protagonist. 48 minutes into the movie we see Hitchcocks’ notion of troubles starting, which begins with a mise en scene; where the black car runs across the courtyard between Jeffs’ view and his neighbors’ buildings. In the short story, we don’t have that imagery of Thorwald driving his car. What we see is Thorwald’s movements throughout the apartment; that becomes Jeff’s obsession and center of attention. Another minor difference is Jeff’s job. While reading the story I totally thought that Jeff was a stalker; who peeps into their neighbors with binoculars? We know Jeff as a photographer in the film. However, rather than not knowing the occupation(in the short story), knowing the occupation makes Jeff peer into his neighbors’ lives pretty easily.

Assignment #2

The place I know in great detail is the house I grew up in back in my country. I still remember it to this day even after the reconstruction. It was a 5 bedroom house with two big living rooms, all in a single floor. We also had farmland in the backyard. As you look in from the street view, you would see a big burgundy door with beautiful designs on it; I remember when we first got it, I was so excited. As entering the house you would see the living room to the right; it was barely used, but I loved how spacious it was. To get to the other bedrooms we had to walk a little; (the way my country builds houses is different) it was more like 5 separate houses. The other living was where we spent a lot of time in, we ate dinner, played around, and had the most guests in. Walking out of the living room we had a big patio and a big sofa, where we sometimes ate lunch. From the patio we take a couple of steps to make our way to the kitchen; and the backyard that is all on the right side. To the left, we had the bedrooms where I shared with my sisters. In Front of the bedrooms, we had another huge patio with swings on it. And lastly on to the back was the bathrooms. The living room, the bedrooms, the kitchen, the bathrooms are all separate, so to get to them we had to walk a little. However, we had this huge backyard where we grew out vegetables.

 

The questions I have after reading the “It Had to Be Murder” by Cornell Woolrich is that how did Mr.Thorwald know where to look and how did he manage to call the narrator? After the talk, we know that the narrator failed in finding where the body was; where Mr.Thorwald called him a liar. How did he manage to find the number and look at the narrator? Another question I have is how did the narrator’s phone get disconnected? The narrator said that his phone wire has been cut off, but we know that Mr.Thorwald did not get into the narrator’s house( I might be mistaken. I am not sure if he actually got into the house. What I thought was, by reading it, that he came through the window and then said “You-” and that’s where the narrator pushed him to the ground).

Assignment #2

The place I know in great detail is the house I grew up in back in my country. I still remember it to this day even after the reconstruction. It was a 5 bedroom house with two big living rooms, all on a single floor. We also had farmland in the backyard. As you look in from the street view, you would see a big burgundy door with beautiful designs on it; I remember when we first got it, I was so excited. As entering the house you would see the living room to the right; it was barely used, but I loved how spacious it was. To get to the other bedrooms we had to walk a little; (the way my country builds houses is different) it was more like 5 separate houses. The other living was where we spent a lot of time in, we ate dinner, played around, and had the most guests in. Walking out of the living room we had a big patio and a big sofa, where we sometimes ate lunch. From the patio we take a couple of steps to make our way to the kitchen; and the backyard that is all on the right side. To the left, we had the bedrooms where I shared with my sisters. In Front of the bedrooms, we had another huge patio with swings on it. And lastly on to the back was the bathrooms. The living room, the bedrooms, the kitchen, the bathrooms are all separate, so to get to them we had to walk a little. However, we had this huge backyard where we grew out vegetables.

 

The questions I have after reading the “It Had to Be Murder” by Cornell Woolrich is that how did Mr.Thorwald know where to look and how did he manage to call the narrator? After the talk, we know that the narrator failed in finding where the body was; where Mr.Thorwald called him a liar. How did he manage to find the number and look at the narrator? Another question I have is how did the narrator’s phone get disconnected? The narrator said that his phone wire has been cut off, but we know that Mr.Thorwald did not get into the narrator’s house( I might be mistaken. I am not sure if he actually got into the house. What I thought was, by reading it, that he came through the window and then said “You-” and that’s where the narrator pushed him to the ground).

Film-Lit Coffeehouse #1

One fun thing that I did this summer was enjoying my shows! Since it was still quarantine, and I could not go to my job or travel as I planned; still I was able to enjoy my summer. During the summer I was able to catch up on the shows that I missed. I like staying home, so not going out didn’t bother me at all. I was also able to enjoy my time with my siblings. We caught up on games that we always play, or catch up on the shows/movies we missed. I was also able to go out hiking with my family; enjoyed some fresh air and a lot of walking. 

 

My favorite story would be The Yellow Wallpaper. This story is more of mystery and horror but also the mental state of a woman; in this case the narrator. The three characters of the story play the part of the narrator’s life; they are her caretaker. The narrator begins her journal with the grandeur of the house that she and her husband, John, just moved into. For the narrator, this house is like a haunted house. As her husband has locked her in and denied the freedom of her to write; she became delusional as to what’s going around her. The narrator got fixated on the yellow paper wall; as if someone was trapped there and trying to get out. What interests me about this story is the denial of the husband as to what is going on with the narrator; even the sisters-in-law did so too. The narrator started behaving irrational and behaving frenzy, biting and tearing the wallpaper in order to free the trapped women. It was as if she was doing so to free herself from the yellow wallpaper room that she was trapped in. The narrator ends up being hopelessly insane, and none helps. The husband’s neglect towards the wife and the indifferent attitude towards the suffering of his wife was really interesting; maybe he wanted her gone and he made her suffer by trapping her in a yellow wallpaper room.