Author: Andre

Coffeehouse #2

This semester I read slightly mystifying pieces of Gothic literature: “The House of Asterion” by Jorge Luis Borges and “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” by Gabriel Garica Marquez. These two stories are undoubtedly Gothic in nature as they share Gothic elements that can be easily identifiable as Gothic fiction.

In “The House of Asterion”, the Gothic elements featured are mysterious people, the dream/death, and dark spaces. This is prevalent when the main character, Asterion, who is revealed to be a minotaur, can be easily seen as mysterious as his perception of himself and society are very cryptic and vague. He acts more intelligent than he is, although he displays a rather childlike personality. His cryptic personality also ties into where Asterion lives, as Asterion himself seems to be confused as to where he lives, as it is also revealed that he lives in a labyrinth, constantly traversing his maze-like citadel waiting for anyone to appear. With that said, his personality also tie in to the plot points: when people actually do appear in the labyrinth to confront Asterion. Asterion’s dream is to confront his redeemer (i.e. the person who will kill him). This ties into the Gothic element of death as the people who enter, in which one of them he hopes to be his redeemer, all try to confront Asterion only to be impaled by Asterion’s horns and killed.

In “A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings”, the Gothic elements featured in that story are mysterious people, the trap/the escape, and bleak/stormy settings. With this story centered around a mysterious, sickly old man with rotting, decrepit wings who arrives at a village and is locked in a cage and exploited/ treated like a pariah for Pelayo’s financial gain. From the mysterious old man’s perspective from being locked in a cage, it possesses the Gothic elements of the trap, and his inevitable departure acts as the escape.

Final Essay: What I Want vs. Who I Want To Be

Delandre Boyd 

ENG 2001/O525

12/13/20

Prof. Scanlan

Word Count: 1144

            What I Want vs. Who I Want To Be

Technological advancements have improved the lives of man since its conception and has continued to do so to this day. But what often goes unnoticed is that even with technology usage, it comes with its own set of ethics, mainly when it comes to the person using them. Whether those ethics are based on rules(deontology), personal values(virtue), the maximization of one’s own happiness(utilitarian), identity/association(feminist), etc, there are ethics we subjectively possess/follow when it comes to the choices on the utilization of our technologies. This is even prevalent in works of fiction. With modernist fiction focusing on the plights of the elite as well as focalizing self-reflexivity and the usage of technology, Ray Bradbury’s “The Veldt” is a perfect example of how characters within the story make decisions based on the ethics they choose to follow in those particular moments. In order to completely understand the decisions made in the story, we must first analyze the 2 prevalent ethics shown in the story: virtue and utilitarianism ethics. 

In summary, Ray Bradbury’s “The Veldt” is about a family consisting of George and Lydia Hadley, and their children Peter and Wendy living in an automated house known as the HappyLife Home, that caters to their whim, completing chores and tasks automatically and effortlessly. However, Peter and Wendy become excessively infatuated with the nursery, a sort of virtual reality room which can transform the room into anything they imagine and they particularly spend their time on African veldt. The parents become concerned about the children’s obsessive time-spending in the nursery and suggest that the automated house be shut off to restore the family’s self-dependence. This infuriates the children as they demand and even threaten the power be restored to the house. The parents acquiesce to the children’s demands and restore the power for one more day. The parents are lured into the nursery only to encounter actual lions and end up being eaten alive.    

One pivotal decision made in the story was the family’s initial installation of the HappyLife Home. In the story it states that the very costly HappyLife Home “clothed and fed and rocked them to sleep and played and sang and was good to them” (Bradbury 2). This decision demonstrated an apparent use of utilitarian ethics as the very installation of the automated aimed to maximize the overall happiness of the family as it completed most, if not all, manual tasks for them that they deemed to be tedious. While this act does seem self-serving, this decision was made to improve the family’s overall welfare and maximize the family’s happiness as they were willing to spare no expense. This is proven when the story stated that the nursery “had cost half again as much as the rest of the house” (Bradbury 2). But with the children’s happiness in mind, George proudly states, “But nothing’s too good for our children” (Bradbury 2). This quote shows that George is putting the children’s overall happiness over any monetary amount. This quote also demonstrates virtue ethics as it shows George and Lydia being the type of parents that would do anything for their children.

Another pivotal decision made in the story is George and Lydia’s choice to shut down the HappyLife Home in favor of a more independent, self-sufficient lifestyle. This choice stems George and Lydia’s concern for the family’s ability to take care of themselves when George states, “ Now we’re going to really start living. Instead of being handled and massaged, we’re going to live” (Bradbury 12).  This choice made by George to fully embrace a more human and self-dependent way of life rather than being catered to by a machine is a demonstration of virtue ethics. This particular decision marks a paradigm shift in the family’s approach to their way of life, as George utilizes utilitarian ethics based on virtue ethics as  this use of virtue ethics stems from a moment of self-reflexivity when they themselves question why they even bought the house in the first place when Peter asks, “Lord, how did we ever get in this house? What prompted us to buy a nightmare?” (Bradbury 12)., with Lydia answering with “Pride, money, foolishness” (Bradbury 12). This demonstrates utilitarian ethics stemming from a shift more toward virtue ethics because they begin to reexamine the type of people they want to become, demonstrating a willingness to change and they feel that reexamination could end up maximizing their happiness in the long-term: becoming the type of people that don’t rely on technology, resulting in them maximizing their happiness in the end.  

The final pivotal decision made in the story is Peter and Wendy’s decision to kill their parents. This decision stems from Peter’s rejection of George’s proposition of a self-dependent lifestyle, due to him feeling that his overall happiness comes from the automated house, or more specifically the nursery. This rejection even results in Peter indirectly threatening his father when he says, “I don’t think you’d better consider it any more, Father” (Bradbury 9) and even more so when he says, “I wish you were dead!” (Bradbury 12). With that automated house being the source of Peter and Wendy’s happiness, and with the threat of it being taken away, the children luring their parents into the nursery for them to be murdered by lions is an example of  utilitarian ethics. This particular act maximizes their happiness due to the fact that it stops the parents from going through with the act of shutting off the house, showing more consideration for technology (that they consider to be more of a parent), than their actual parents. 

In conclusion, technology plays quite an interchangeable role in our ethical decision-making. Our ethics can decide how we use technology as demonstrated in the first pivotal decision (George and Lydia using utilitarian ethics to purchase an automated house to cater to their every need), and technology can affect how ethical decision-making as in the final two pivotal decision (George and Lydia transitioning into using virtue ethics after feeling/being overly dependent on the automated house & Peter and Wendy’s obsessive reliance on the automated house leading them to kill their parents, thus maximizing their happiness based on utilitarian ethics). With the decision-making in Ray Bradbury’s “The Veldt” revolving around the maximization of happiness as well as the type of people they want to become, this particular elitist family within this modernist fiction follows virtue and utilitarian ethical decision-making that causes/is caused by the events in story.

Works Cited

Bradbury, R. (1950). The Veldt.

https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/163728/The%20Veldt%20-%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf


Scanlan, S. (2020) Five types of Ethics https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/profscanlan-english2001-fiction-f2020/files/2020/11/Five-types-of-Ethics-fall-2020.docx

Coffeehouse #5

My favorite story I’ve read this semester would have to be “The Veldt” by Ray Bradbury, mainly due to the fact that even though the story initially came across as very straightforward, the ending caught me off guard. In summary, the story was about a family who lived in an automated that catered to their every whims via telepathic emanations to the extent that they began to lack any sort of self-reliance/independence, but more so began to have a more devastating effect on the children, Peter and Wendy. Their parents, George and Lydia felt that the house replaced them as mother and father as the automated house completely stripped them of their parental duty of taking care of their kids, but it mainly came down to the fact that the children spent most of their time in the nursery (a sort of glorified virtual reality room) and usually had it on the African veldt setting. When advised to shut down the house, the children adamantly and vehemently reject this idea, taking this rejection to the extreme by threatening and even devising and carrying out a plan to kill their parents by locking them in the nursery with actual lions. 

The main characters are the entire family (the parents: George and Lydia, the children: Peter and Wendy), including the house itself due to the crucial role it plays in both the family’s lives and the children’s perception/treatment of the parents. But I’d say the main character would have to be George.

I believe that displays a hybrid of utilitarian and virtue ethics throughout the entire story. His utilitarian ethics are put on display when he becomes fully committed to turning off the automated house. By turning off the house, he felt that he is maximizing the overall good of the family, but mainly his children who have become completely dependent on the house. He also demonstrates his utilization of virtue ethics in that particular instance as well, as he feels that becoming over-reliant on the house isn’t something he wants for his children. He wants him and his family to become more independent as he doesn’t want to become a person who can’t take care of himself.

Delandre Boyd – Midterm Essay

Delandre Boyd

Midterm Essay, ENG 2001 O525

10/26/20

Perverseness & Corruption

In Gothic literature, there are a myriad of elements contained within each narrative that enhances the depth of not only the narrative itself, but the depth within each character. However, the defining element in Gothic literature is the Spirit of Perverseness. In summary, the Spirit of Perverseness is described as a person doing what is unacceptable, for the sake of doing so, even if the behavior proves to be self-destructive. But what significance does the Spirit of Perverseness have on Gothic literature? In this essay, I will analyze how the Spirit of Perverseness affects the once peaceful-turned-sadistic narrator in Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Black Cat” and the once trusting-turned-paranoid Goodman Brown in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown” and examine how the underlying theme of corruption furthers our understanding behind the characters and their actions.

In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Black Cat”, the unnamed narrator undergoes a series of drastic, depraved and seemingly sociopathic personality changes, transforming from a benevolent, caring child and growing to be a violent, murderous sadist who willingly inflicts pain on a harmless black cat that he once cared for, even going as far as killing and concealing the body of his own wife. What stands out however, is his rationalization behind his violent acts towards others: the Spirit of Perverseness, which makes him “do wrong for the wrong’s sake only” (Poe 4). The vile acts inflicted upon his cat were committed with evil intentions and self-awareness, as his embracing of the Spirit of Perverseness demonstrated his complete acceptance of his apparent moral corruption, as the narrator is completely self-aware and unfazed by his actions, while being unconcerned of the consequences, and goes as far as considering his act of depravity a normal human act.

In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown” , a once trusting, righteously spiritual man of faith goes out on a journey into the night, seemingly leading to the revelation of the righteous townspeople being devil worshippers, including his beloved wife, Faith. These events appear to be somewhat misleading as the events of the story might have been a figment of Goodman Brown’s imagination, but seemed to be enough to convince Goodman Brown to distrust everyone in his community, isolating himself from even his own wife, until his grim death. The Spirit of Perverseness is apparent within this Gothic story as well, as Goodman Brown is  seemingly willing to abandon his own faith, by attending the ceremony, in a distraught yet, completely self-aware moment of delusion when it was state that he was “… maddened with despair, … with the instinct that guides mortal man to evil. ” (Hawthorne, 53). This demonstrates Goodman Brown’s apparent lapse of discernment that drives him to embrace the Spirit of Perverseness, attending the ceremony to his own moral corruption  and religious detriment. 

With the Spirit of Perverseness being prevalent in both stories, the two stories share similarities revolving around the underlying theme of corruption in both “The Black Cat” and “Young Goodman Brown”, as both characters experience corruption that not only alter their outlook on life and society, but completely transform them as individuals. Both the narrator and Goodman Brown were kind individuals before succumbing to corruption.  They both, as a result of corruption, suffer grim fates at the end of their respective stories. Due to their experiences corrupting their societal and personal outlook, they end up abandoning/betraying those they once cared for.

As the underlying theme of corruption acted as a common link between these two particular pieces of Gothic literature, the catalyst behind their corruptive aspects  differ. In Poe’s “The Black Cat, one of the catalysts behind his corruption and perverse acts of depravity seem to be a result of his alcoholism when he states, “ returning home, much intoxicated, from one of my haunts about town, I fancied that the cat avoided my presence. I seized him” (Poe, 5),  demonstrating that the narrators’ behavior toward the black cat grew excessively violent as the narrator mutilated the harmless and defenseless cat in a drunken rage. But while alcoholism seems to be more tangible of a catalyst, another origin behind his corruption is time, when the narrator himself states, “I grew, day by day, more moody, more irritable, more regardless of the feelings.. even offered her personal violence.” (Poe, 4), showing the disdain he felt for his wife as the days progressed and demonstrated how time factored into the narrator’s callous behavior as his compassion for life in general seemed to have diminished, becoming a shadow of his former self, showing that a more intangible, conceptual catalyst had such an immense on the narrator’s behavior, greatly different from how he was in adolescent  years. With that said however, the main corruptive element in “Young Goodman Brown”, seems to be Goodman Brown’s own mind, or more specifically, his fear. As stated before, the catalyst behind Goodman Brown’s corruption can be easily mistaken, as the events behind the encounters transpired within the woods could’ve possibly been a mere hallucination as Goodman Brown’s awakening alone in the woods. With that said, however, Goodman Brown possibly imagining the townspeople, along with his wife Faith, taking part in a demonic ritual/ceremony shows that Goodman Brown is his own corruptive element. The prospect of his own mind being a corruptive element becomes truer when the story states , “Be it so, if you will… from the night of that fearful dream”  (Hawthorne, 71-72), it shows that whether or not the events did happen, the mere prospect of it happening was enough to corrupt Goodman Brown, and change who he is completely.

The Spirit of Perverseness and corruption are two very divisive elements of human nature, which further the reason why humans are such complex beings. But by delving into both elements, we enhance our understanding behind certain actions people take and the reason why people behave the way they do. Two prime examples of this are, “The Black Cat” narrator and “Young Goodman Brown”’s Goodman Brown, as understanding the root of their respective corruptions and analyzing them and establishing the moment when they encounter/embrace the Spirit of Perverseness, we can understanding why the kind, softhearted individuals became the antithesis of who they once were, thus making gothic literature exponentially more enjoyable to readers.

Virtual Coffeehouse #2

The two short stories, “The House of Asterion” and “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings”, share similar gothic elements that helps convey the hidden and very cryptic meanings behind both the stories and and the unusual characters. The first element, the characters, are similar in the sense that they feared and ostracized by their respective members of the society. Asterion, in “The House of Asterion” is a puzzling, misanthropic and seemingly crazed individual, later revealed to be a minotuar, who acts an imprisoned captive, condemned to isolation due to the fears of the villagers. In “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings”, the frail winged old man who was perceived to be an angel by the townspeople. The man was soon caged and was treated like a spiritual spectacle and a pariah, and (in the eyes of Elisenda), a being worthy of being exploited by humanity for the wishes/desires.

The second gothic element, the plot points, were that both stories involved the concept of death/near death, that furthered the narrative while revealing slight details revolving the mythical creatures in both stories. In “The House of Asterion”, the villagers send a set of nine villagers every nine years, seemingly as sacrifices, to appease Asterion for fear of incurring his wrath. However, in “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings”, while the frail winged old man is found by Pelayo, on the verge of death, there is a moment of miraculous survival by the mysterious creature as he, throughout the story, suffers the torment and humiliation of being treated like a pariah by the townspeople, somehow regains his strength and manages to fly away in the end.

In the third gothic element, the settings, they are completely different from one another. In “The House of Asterion”, the setting described by Asterion himself is cryptic in nature, at one point, possibly alluding to the prospect of the setting being a figment of Asterion’s imagination as he vividly describes the house having an infinite amount of doors, courtyards, etc. Asterion’s description of his house is tailored to seem like either a warped hallucination/delusion or a labyrinth. However, in “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings”, the setting was more realistic as it took place in a town/village, or in the winged individual’s case, wired chicken coop which acted as his cage/makeshift prison until the chicken coop degraded and eventually fell apart.

Virtual Coffeehouse 1

This summer I engaged in my usual activities: playing video games, watching anime, listening to music and practicing coding. But one thing that I did that slightly motivated/educated me was doing some research on some considerable approaches regarding what stocks to acquire. Specifically ones that would maintain a steady level of growth both during and after the pandemic, and are affordable. I know I won’t become the “Wizard of Wall Street” in just a few months, but just having the basic knowledge motivated to continue doing more research on it to hopefully become a full-time investor.

Overall, my favorite story was “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, due to the dark irony behind the story’s name and the events that transpire within the story. When one usually imagines winning the lottery, they don’t associate it with getting stoned to death. Another reason behind my favoring this story over the others are the themes behind it, one of them regarding the concept of mob mentality and how it affects society and traditions. This is most evident when considering that the townspeople have no qualms about killing a member of their community for the sake of tradition and at the behest of the community leader. I would say “The Black Cat” is a close second however, due to it being a somewhat sobering yet very disturbing take on concepts pertaining to the human condition. But I chose “The Lottery” because I sensed those same concepts in that story but it was more of a widespread matter regarding a community not just one person.