The re-vision process is showing me, one positive and one negative feature of my writing that I wouldn’t otherwise notice. One positive outcome of this is re-reading my own writing brings out certain missing or unnoticed details. Another possible feature is that when we do peer reviews another person’s point of view might pick up something that I missed. Therefore, I can apply those ideas to my own writing and make my writing more understandable. One negative feature might be that my peer and I might not be on the same page as the mistake them or I made.  This can make or break my paper because many people see different mistakes differently, causing the writer to be stuck on ideas and thoughts.