The re-vision process showed me how my writing has some minor mistakes that need to be fix but also some good features. The one positive feature that my partner pointed out to me in the peer review exercise was my ability to break down contents in writing, like quotes, sentences and words, to help the reader have a better understanding of them.This means that I explain what a quote or statement means by breaking them down word by word so it will be easier to understand. I also define certain words for the reader so they will be less complicated to know. However, the one negative feature that my partner pointed out to me was my inability to elaborate on certain topics in my writing that I’ve never notice before.For instance, I didn’t elaborate more on my rhetorical choice for my essay, which was “metaphor,” but instead I added up elaborating more on a different rhetorical choice, “allusion,” which I also didn’t notice I was doing.Overall, this exercise showed me that while I’m great at breaking down contents for readers to understand better, I need to work on elaborating more on certain topics or statements in my writing so that I don’t make the same mistake in the future. I believe that the re-vision process is very helpful as it can help writers understand what mistakes they made that they didn’t notice before so that they will make sure that it doesn’t happen again in any future writings. I will make sure to use this lesson for my final draft so I can make sure that I elaborate more on my rhetorical choice and not make the same mistake twice.