Table of Contents
Rubrics
Project 1 Outline Rubric
Item | 1 | 3 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|
Introduction Thesis statement | Ignored | Attempted | Comparison or contrast statement of two immersive artists from the assigned video |
Introduction Description of selected artist collaborative method and audience or environment interaction method | Ignored | description | Collaborators defined. audience interaction method defined |
Introduction Name of one piece of art and description of audience interaction with the art | Ignored | description | Name of one piece of art and description of audience interaction with the art |
Introduction How is integration of Art and technology key to the presentation of the artwork | Ignored | question presented with no outcome | Question answered |
Supporting paragraph 1 Discuss each sculpture and the technology used to create it. Describe the type of audience interaction with it. | Ignored | question presented with no outcome | Discuss each sculpture and the technology used to create it. Describe the type of audience interaction with it. |
Supporting paragraph 2 Discuss each sculpture and the technology used to create it. Describe the type of audience interaction with it. | Ignored | question presented with no outcome | Discuss each sculpture and the technology used to create it. Describe the type of audience interaction with it. |
Supporting paragraph 3 Compare or contrast the two artists. What did they have in common or contrast with their completed artwork? Why did each artist consider audience participation important? | Ignored | question presented with no outcome | Question answered |
Conclusion Restate your thesis. What technologies did the artists share. What was the significant comparison or contrast your found in your writing. If you have the opportunity which artist would you like to meet and work for? What type of technology would you want to work with and contribute? What technology do you need to study to complete this goal? | ignored | question presented with no outcome | Restate your thesis. What technologies did the artists share? What was the significant comparison or contrast your found in your writing. If you have the opportunity which artist would you like to meet and work for? What type of technology would you want to work with and contribute. What technology do you need to study to complete this goal? |
Vocabulary | ignored | 5 words used | 5 words used and defined |
Citations | ignored | mentioned | all content included |
Project 1 Rough draft Rubric
Item | 0 | 3 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|
Introduction Thesis statement | Ignored | Attempted | Comparison or contrast statement of two immersive artists from the assigned video |
Introduction Description of selected artist collaborative method and audience or environment interaction method | Ignored | description | Collaborators defined. audience interaction method defined. |
Introduction Name of one piece of art and description of audience interaction with the art | Ignored | description | Artwork is named, described and interaction defined |
Introduction 4. How is integration of Art and technology key to the presentation of the artwork | Ignored | question presented with no outcome | integration of technology and art topic is clear. |
Supporting paragraph 1 Discuss one sculpture and the technology used to create it. Describe the intended audience interaction | Absence of support for main points | Generalizations with no specific content to support main theme | Discussion is well focused on the topic and supported with details. |
Supporting paragraph 2 Discuss one sculpture and the technology used to create it. Describe the intended audience interaction | Absence of support for main points | Generalizations with no specific content to support main theme | Ideas unified to theme of essay. Supported with evidence |
Supporting paragraph 3 Compare or contrast the two artists. What did they have in common or contrast with their completed artwork? Why did each artist consider audience participation important? | Absence of support for main points | question presented with no outcome | Ideas unified to theme of essay. Supported with evidence |
Conclusion Restate your thesis. What technologies did the artists share. What was the significant comparison or contrast your found in your writing. If you have the opportunity which artist would you like to meet and work for? What type of technology would you want to work with and contribute? What technology do you need to study to complete this goal? | ignored | question presented with no outcome | Restate thesis. Main ideas are clear with defined outcomes. |
Vocabulary | ignored | 5 words used | 5 words used and defined. Effective word usage |
Citations Ideas supported by Evidence | no evidence | mentioned in writing non-specific use of evidence | foot noted, Authors ideas are supported with logic and value |
Sentence structure | confusing sentences. | incomplete sentences Repetitive content | Good sentence structured. Varied lengths and word usage. |
Grammar and spelling | 5 or more spelling and grammar errors | 1-4 spelling and grammar errors | Good grammar and spelling |
Word choice | slang or misuse of words. | Repetitive word choices. Inaccurate work choices | Variety of words used. Interesting and vivid words used. |
The theme of the essay is clear and consistent | The writing is one long description of the videos without any theme. | The theme is present in the introduction or conclusion without consistency | Evidence, knowledge and relevant information |
Project 1 Final Rubric
Item | 0 | 3 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|
Introduction Thesis statement | No thesis statement | Main idea is simple | Main idea clear and well developed |
Introduction Description of selected artist, artwork, collaborative method and audience or environment interaction method | Ignored | description | Focus on main artists and a specific work is clear. |
Introduction How is integration of Art and technology key to the presentation of the artwork | Ignored | question presented with no outcome | integration of technology and art topic is clear. |
Structure and organization | paragraph structure is missing no organization evident. | Limited attempts to organize around central idea, paragraphs stand alone. Few or no transitions | Organized and sequential appropriate content for the assignment |
Conclusion Restate your thesis. What technologies did the artists share. What was the significant comparison or contrast your found in your writing. If you have the opportunity which artist would you like to meet and work for? What type of technology would you want to work with and contribute? What technology do you need to study to complete this goal? | ignored | question presented with no outcome | Restate thesis. Main ideas are clear with defined outcomes. |
Vocabulary | ignored | 5 words used and defined | 5 words used and defined. Effective word usage. |
Citations | No citations | mentioned in writing. | foot noted. Evidence used to support ideas |
Notes | Ignore | A few notes taken and used for rewrite | Most notes from previous rubrics read and integrated into the project |
Grammar and spelling | no updates to grammar or spelling | 1-4 spelling or grammar errors | Good grammar and spelling |