Dear Steve,

From writing the two different summaries on open lab i found, yet again difficulties in balancing specific information from the text with generalizations about Nicholas Carr’s points throughout the chapter. However, the peer review helped in various ways. One important piece was taking out a bunch of unnecessary words that might put me to close to the word count. Another, aspect was the emphasis, from both me and my peer review, of declaring a proper thesis in the beginning to make Carr’s points clear. Other things like spelling and grammar we’re also good pointers on both sides.

best,

Dwight