The networking event that I went to was called New York Comics & Picture-Story Symposium: Michael Hearn on The Picture Book Revolution. This event was located at The New School, which is located at 14th Street. It was supposed to be about how the Silver age art movement known as “World of Art” transformed into an aggressive propaganda era of children’s books in Soviet Russia under Lenin, and Stalin. At first, I was very interested because art is known for making messages better than talking ever could, and I wanted to see how far this concept actually went. Also, this assignment forced me to actually go out, and interact with random strangers for the sake of networking even though I really didn’t want to. I tried to have high hopes that this would actually beneficial as well as worth my time. However, I ended up reacting in a way that heavily opposed my forced optimism as I found the experience to be very displeasing.

Honestly, I seriously disliked this event because the speakers spoke over one thousand words a minute. It was like hearing a machine gun fire off non-stop for long periods of time. This was rather irritating to the point that I barely had any idea as to what on Earth they were saying. To me, conversations went from children’s books to straight up gibberish. I literally learned nothing useful from this experience. The only information that I did learn from the panel was “Blah, blah, blah”. As far as I know, this isn’t even remotely useful to know for the future, yet that was all they provided.

Adding to the aforementioned complaint, I felt that the way this event was set up was unprofessional. Coming into this event, I believed that The New School would have a refined, and artsy atmosphere to coincide with what they want prospective students to feel. However, I got the complete opposite. These panel speakers, as well as the organizers gave me the vibe that they really didn’t want to be there. For starters, the organizers had the same gloomy look as if they were forced to work, which is a real downer. Secondly, having the speakers talk so rapidly gave off the impression that they wanted to just say a script, and immediately leave. Lastly, the speakers were also speaking in a way that they were just talking amongst themselves, and ignoring the rest of us. It was extremely rude, and they were very aware of it.

Lastly, my main issue with this networking event was that nobody was prepared to network. There were literally no participants with business cards aside from myself, and Rosanna. It was so strange because that’s the point of having a networking event. Business cards are used to network, so what the heck? It made this entire thing pointless. What made me even angrier was that I did something that I truly hate, which is to interact with a room full of complete strangers, just to get nothing positive out of it. All that I got was a completely negative impression about this school, and its environment. The main life lesson out of everything there was that some people in the industry are just straight up useless, and it raises more questions as to how they managed to actually get a career in the first place.

In summary, this networking event was nowhere near satisfactory, or even pleasant for that matter. It was an utter letdown to say the least. I really expected more from an institution that is supposedly prestigious along with a panel of individuals who claim to be from the industry. For something that was purposely assigned to get me out of my comfort zone, it was nothing but a false bag of goods that wasted my time. I already felt that this assignment was seriously pushing me to the limit in terms of extreme anxiety, but to also test my patience really had me feeling so goddamn salty. It heavily impacted me because I started to feel skeptical about the industry due to its ever so strong soul draining vibe. After this, I now prefer to work for myself so I can retain my humanity, make a living doing what I love, and give the people what they really want without being held back by such awful drones who call themselves members of the “industry”.

For this class, we saw two TEDtalks about Stefan Sagmeister. He is a graphic designer who originated from Austria, but currently works in New York City. In both of the TEDtalks that I saw, he spoke about the correlation between design and happiness. From my understanding of this, it is a rather tricky feat. While showing happiness is a very simple task, making people feel this way is easier said than done. What makes this especially difficult is how outlandish some of his ideas tend to be. Even now, some work makes me smile, while others keep me in a state of utter confusion. Regardless of whether or not you understand what he creates, he still manages to keep an attentive audience.

Despite not being able to make sense of everything Sagmeister creations, I find myself unable to dislike anything because it’s all so weird. I can’t properly explain it, but his designs come off as extremely weird. For example, he created a piece called “AIGA New Orleans Jambalaya”, which shows a decapitated chicken running away from typography. As I stare at this piece, I can’t help but ask myself, “What the f*ck am I staring at”? It’s so weird that I have no idea how to properly react. Yet, I can’t dislike it. I prefer to learn more about it than hate it.

Aside from the oddities that Sagmeister creates, I find it very interesting how he is very collaborative. Usually, most designers would either limit whom they want to work with or just stay solo. However, he seems to be very interested in collaborating with other graphic designers. An example that was shown during one of the TEDtalks was a set of steamed windows with happy messages written on them by Sagmeister, and other designers, such as Milton Glaser. I found this idea of collaborating to be very intriguing since I find it strange to see designers at a higher level working together just because they want to rather than having an incentive. It’s as if Sagmeister has such a powerful charisma that makes people want to work with him even if they have absolutely no reason to do so, and I find this to be a very amazing trait to have.

Adding to the aforementioned charisma, not only do people respond to it, but also it seems that he also likes to give said feelings back. In one of the TEDtalks, he brings up other people’s designs that made him experience happiness. One experience in particular was Ji Lee’s “Bubble Project”, where blank speech bubbles were places all over New York City, and the public would fill them in with anything they wanted. He felt happy from this project because it allowed him to be just as invested in the design process along with the entire public. When you think about it, he doesn’t have to acknowledge a random designer’s work, and just focus on his own instead. However, this project made him so happy that he wanted to give some of his charisma to this designer by talking about the project with such passion. To me, this shows that he genuinely appreciates designers, and their work instead of being so self-absorbed.

Overall, I find Sagmeister to be a very interesting designer. To me, he stands out from many designers with his oddball designs, ability to collaborate, as well as his charisma while retaining professional design decorum. Most designers would rather stick to themselves, and act all uptight towards others. Instead, he is very positively involved in his projects, as well as an interested spectator towards others’ designs. I can’t help but want to see more of his work to feel the happiness, and positivity that is portrayed in them.

As I walked into this class, I did not really expect much. This type of class is not something that could interest me. Normally, I tend to be more enthusiastic about anything related to illustration as opposed to just graphic design. To be very blunt, I’m just taking this class to complete my upper electives requirement. Never did I expect to actually find such interesting subject matter during class.

For starters, I had to get a crash course on the different types of past graphic design. Russian Constructivism, Dadaism, and Swiss International Style were some of graphic design styles that I had to get recaps for. This turned out to be an interesting recap as the explanations were more straightforward here than in the History of Graphic Design class that I took two years ago. Instead of spending an entire semester vaguely explaining what these styles were, the core information was properly explained in one hour. Also, the explanations were not boring either.

Aside from the design recap, we also had to ask questions about what we expect to know in the class. However, I didn’t even have a question to give. It wasn’t because I knew everything (which I obviously do not), but because I had no idea as to what I should expect. For somebody who primarily cares about just drawing all day, I did not come to class with Topics in Graphic Design on the brain. Plus, most of the questions that I could have asked were already brought up, so I was left at a blank for the rest of the class. In a way, this provided the reality of my situation being that I am not the only one who is curious about some sort of aspect to this class, even though I find myself to be extremely clueless.

Lastly, I found myself watching a TEDtalk about the clarity and mystery that can be used in graphic design. This was the moment when I had an epiphany; I already had this graphic design knowledge staring right at me this whole time. Like the examples used in the TEDtalk, there have been many times when I have seen content look either obvious, helpful, confusing, and just straight up ridiculous because of how they were designed. I see stuff like this everyday, but never did I actually analyze anything in this sense until now. It felt like a wake up call as I can now see designs, and wonder about what went on in the designer’s mind when trying to create content.

In short, my first day in this class was a real eye opener. It was a huge reality check about how there really is a hell of a lot more to graphic design than just having a process of thumbnails, and other sketches to create something. I now see that everything is in a web of many different aspects of what pertains to graphic design, which includes different styles, approachable questions, and interpretations. There truly is a lot more for me to learn, and comprehend about graphic design now that I found myself just scratching at the surface of it all. Can’t wait to see what else is there to fully understand in this class.