Author: Shylin Ferrera

Final Essay – Shylin Ferrera

Shylin Ferrera

ENG 2001-O525

Word Count: 1124

The Ethical Decisions of Jaswinder ‘Jazz’ Smith

In this essay, I will explain the ethical decisions made by Jaswinder Smith, better known as ‘Jazz’, in “Say Hello, Wave Goodbye”. Throughout the story, Jazz follows a certain code of ethics known as Virtue Ethics. Virtue Ethics is focused on the notion of the individual, answering the question of what type of person I should be? It takes on a more personal element as morals, virtues, and codes are applied on a situational basis rather than clear cut rules. When we compare this to Jazz’s job which is described as an immigration officer, It strongly differs from what ethics may be required at such a high-risk position. Being an Immigration officer inherently comes with a set of rules and guidelines, however, these calls do not always speak to how Jazz chooses to act and respond ethically. The story itself follows Jazz through a day in her life on the job, sectioned into three interactions with the people she puts into holding, essentially blocking their passage into the UK. The decision she makes and ethical choices regarding said decisions are what makes up the moral framework of her character. During this time we watch as Jazz follows the codes of her job and the codes of her life, applying her ethics to each individual situation.

Early on in the story Jazz meets a young teenage girl by the name of Megan. Upon meeting her, Jazz asks her a myriad of questions all while noting that “she wouldn’t look [her] in the eye.” Megan’s nervousness and lack of understanding become increasingly evident throughout Jazz’s questions as she lists her reasons for entry as wanting to see candles at Madame Tussauds and try “-some of that world-famous British pizza.” As readers, we understand that These answers are both inconsistent and strange as Madame Tussauds does not house candles nor is Britain known for pizza. As the story progresses we later find out that Megan was planning on meeting a boy, specifically Prince Harry, yet, despite this, Jazz does not allow her entry. This directly contrasts with her actions at the beginning of the story when she allows a woman in a wedding dress to pass through. The woman exclaimed the improbable idea of a marriage between her and prince harry. Despite the ludicrous nature of this fictitious wedding, Jazz Still allowed her entry, however, this decision was not without questions as she states “- had the girl in the wedding dress ever been refused entry to the Uk? Did she have a return ticket? Did she have sufficient funds for what was planned to be a two week Stay?” And so on. These questions are similar to the ones she asks herself in regards to Megan. Yet in that case, she tells the girl no.  She explains that “-I don’t care if someone lies to themselves, – but I don’t like it much when they lie to me.” The nature of the situation, when comparing Megan to the woman in the wedding dress is the same, yet Jazz’s decision rests on her morals. We, as the reader, can tell that Jazz values honesty and that she may have some personal concerns in regards to Means ‘situation’. The situation in question being a young girl traveling alone to a country she is unfamiliar with, along with no return ticket. With these factors in mind Jazz can arguably be acting on her Virtue ethics. If the rules were clear cut regardless of Circumstance,  she would have treated both Megan and the woman in the wedding dress the same, however, we know this is not the case. She somewhat acts on her emotions in a sense, showing both concerns for Megan’s situation as well as disdain in being lied to. She also identifies the moral consequence of allowing an adult to enter the UK unsupervised versus an unsupervised teenager.

Similar actions can be seen when we look at her interaction with Donald Harrison, another man She stops from entering the UK. When she first meets Donald she remarks on how normal she looks and is made to believe he’s just a standard visitor, it isn’t until he states his reason for travel that we learn of the man’s mental state. He claims that he’s there to seek political asylum due to Barack Obama planting a microchip in his brain. Even more improbable of a notion when compared t0 Megan, Jazz denies him entry. If it were just this, Jazz could clearly be stated as simply following the rules of her job, however, her interaction after that gives us readers access to her code of Ethics. In both her interactions with Donald, Jazz is never dismissive nor rude. Instead, jazz humors the man in conversation as well as ‘protects’ him right before his return trip. This protection comes in the form of withholding the truth. At the end of her shift, she sits with Donald explaining to him that his family had reported him missing and are waiting for him back home. The news comes as a shock to him as he questions the fact that he questions the idea of family. She continues to explain to him that they are going to put him on a plane back and that his family will be waiting on the other side. Here, Donald asks “But what happened to me? – What the hell happened to me” This alludes to some sort of unconfirmed mental issue. Whatever the case may be, it’s clear that Donald is completely unaware of his travels, of his claim of being micro-chipped, of almost anything leading up to this moment. When he proposed his question to Jazz in hopes of finding out what exactly has happened to him, she makes the conscious choice to not tell him stating, “[she] was on the verge of telling him about being refused and removed. Why it happened. What it meant. But she knew that wasn’t really what he was asking about, so she just gave him a little smile, and she said nothing.” This decision also speaks towards virtue ethics, as the decision to do what can be perceived as caring and considerate; considerate of him, his mental state, and slightly of his family who may be struggling with Donald as well.

Jazz’s actions in “Say Hello, Wave Goodbye”  are in clear alignment with virtue ethics. She is a woman that despite her high-security job with a strict set of rules to follow, does not only pass judgment based on said rules. She often follows her intuition and personal decisions as she navigates through the people she meets during her job. Her actions indicate that not only is she considerate of the circumstances but of the people themselves, doping what she deems right.

Work Cited:

ScanIan, S. (2020). A short introduction to five types of ethics. https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/profscanlan-english2001-fiction-f2020/files/2020/11/Five-types-of-Ethics-fall-2020.docx

Parsons. T (2011). Say Hello, Wave Goodbye. In Departures – Seven Stories from Heathrow. Harpercollins.

Coffeehouse 5

My favorite story at this point of the semester has been “Say Hello, Wave Goodbye.” I Found the characters and narrative to be not only compelling but true to life as well. Jazz’s, the immigration officer, had all the sarcasm and wit of someone id expect to run into during my daily life. I’ve always been drawn to a sense of reality in stories and reading of Jazz’s exploits felt as though I was having a conversation with a friend. It was a refreshing change of pace given the stories we have read so far have all had a more sad/ dreary undertone.

As we follow Jazz throughout the story, we’re given a glimpse into a day of her life as an immigration officer. Mundane in the delivery, yet exciting for those looking in, Jazz’s life can be viewed as controlled chaos. She’s in a position of relative power as she chooses who can and cannot have access to the UK. During this particular shift, she meets a myriad of people who she deems “unfit” for entry. The people include an older man who rambles on about the band Queen and being micro-chipped by the president. A middle-aged man with a fake passport and something to hide, as well as a teenage girl with no return ticket and vague reasoning’s for her travels. It’s these decisions she makes in holding these people back that speak towards Jazz’s code of Ethics. She not only follows the rules of her job but proclaims that she has to give her own personal judgments. Given this, one could argue that Jazz follows virtue ethics. Whereas her job has a -set- code of conducts and rules, Jazz is seen applying her intuition and principles dependent on the situation. This is evident when looking towards the beginning of the story where she allows one lady to enter when she exclaims she’s going to marry the Prince of England and not the teenager who gives similar reasons. Jazz recognized that the rules do not apply to every situation and have to be handled accordingly.

Shylin Ferrera #Coffeehouse 3

A Rose for Emily remarks on the tale of a woman idolized as the embodiment of the past. She is a living testament of times past, engraved into the lives and memory of all those living in Jefferson. Throughout the story, we learn of the idolization, yet also the disdain the townsfolk have of her. As her life passes her bye and things change, modernize, and advance, she often is out of control of the world around her. She has no say in getting a husband in her younger years so she’s left loveless well into her thirties. She Denies any advancement; even to have her metal house numbers attached to her home is too much. Not to mention her refusal to recognize her father’s death of the old mayor. Things are out of Emily’s control, yet what little control she does get, she’s ostracized for her choices. In a sense, Emily is a paradox within and of herself. Having been characterized as a “weak” woman controlled in her youth and her stature, she was also strong in her convictions, especially in the eventual murdering of her love, Homer.

The second story Bartleby, the Scrivener, I found a bit more difficult to read through as is the case with most of Herman Melville’s work. Bartleby, the Scrivener, tells the story of Bartelby, a copyist the Lawyer hires to work under him. Although internally except optional at his job for the first two days, Bartleby quickly regresses in the most mundane and passive manner he can: by simply and politely refusing to do his job. He does so in a manner that is so surprising and so difficult to combat that he’s initially able to do so with little resistance from the Lawyer. There is something to be said about passive resistance, as it can her the enemy of gene the most patient of people. Similarly, Passive aggressiveness is somewhat a paradox within its right. There is something so subtle in outright refusing someone in a manner that is so polite it can simply not be rebuked.

Similar to A Rose for Emily, there is little retribution for these characters. One could argue that Emily is her redemption in death. Having little control in her own life, Her last act of Power is taking the lives of both her and the own she loved. Comparable to Bartleby who also dies at the end of the story, however, I would theorize that his redemption comes at the hands of the Lawyer. The Lawyer finally feels as though Bartleby is humanized in his death, that he is not insane, but a depressed man fed up with the mundane and the corporatist rule of life. Also, in less of redemption and more of a release, the Lawyer is no longer consumed by the mystery that was Bartleby. Instead, he was able to label him, and end the passive-aggressive cycle that took a hold on him in the beginning.

Coffeehouse #2 Shylin Ferrera

A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings: A Tale For ChildrenGabriel Garcia Marquez

A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings centers around “The Old man”, a presumed angel that came to take away the life of Pelayo and Elisenda’s child during on grey stormy night. However, due to fatigue and old age, the old man is left to reside in the chicken coop of Pelayo and Elisenda’s yard. The Mysterious man is treated with little compassion and is treated as a captive animal. Much to the disdain of Elisenda, He stood in the yard for months if not years until he eventually flies away.

The plot focuses on this surreal and almost magical experience that quickly becomes normal. It’s a satirical take on the nature of humans to take the wonder and significance out of life in general. Rather than be amazed, Elisenda is annoyed by the angel’s presence. Instead of having compassion for the old man, Pelayo and Elisenda decide to put him behind a fence and charge money. Instead of admiration, the spectators beat and brandish the old man. It is these plot points that express the eventual return normalcy within the story. The angel becomes mundane until he eventually takes flight, leaving Elisenda to watch as he flies away not as an old man with wings, but as an angel.

The House of Asterion Jorge Luis Borges

The House of Asterion begins with that of Asterion himself, as he starts by refuting claims of him being arrogant, insane, or a misanthropist. He goes on to describe where he lives, and how despite what people may call a prison, is his home. There is no furniture, and despite the “infinite” doors, none are locked. The plot focuses on Asterion’s life within this infinite maze as well as his denial of the truth. Such is the nature of life to hold unimaginable truths, as is Asterion to seek out his unimaginable truth; redemption and inevitable death. A death, at the hand of his “redemptioner”, Theseus, who notes on the lack of a struggle the minotaur (Asterion) puts up. Unbeknownst to Asterion, this is the hero he seeks.