1) Finish writing and post your responses to Zizek’s article on the blog by Thursday. (I’ve copied the questions below.) In your response, introduce and discuss at least one quotation from the article (we’ve been practicing this recently—see Course Notes
2) Finish reading Michelle Nijhuis’ guide to bullshit prevention and come to class prepared to talk about what she’s saying and how it might be important for thinking about research strategies.
Zizek Response Qs:
—1) What is the argument Zizek is responding to? Where does it become clear that he agrees/disagrees with this argument?
—2) Which points in this argument does Zizek respond to with criticism?
—3) What are some of the strategies Zizek uses to critique the argument he disagrees with? (e.g. analogy/comparison, logical reasoning, rhetorical questions, etc.)
—4) What is YOUR response to all of this? Do you agree with Zizek? Why/why not? Do you have any life experience with any of the topics mentioned in the article (eg, video games)? How does this experience influence your response to this topic?
We will be thinking more in the weeks ahead about why it will be good for you to add information from another “more scholarly” article or two to your Essay 2. With that in mind, in Packet II, read Nijhuis’ “The Pocket Guide To Bullshit Prevention.”
Also read “Do Sex-bots Have Rights?” by Slavoj Zizek (in Packet II).
Post the title, author, and publication of an article you found using a library database. Also tell us which database you used (see below for links).
Re-read Lauren Duca’s “The Viral Virus” (Packet I). Look up any words you need to know in order to understand this article and to write well about it.
Below are some Databases to Play With (for most of these, you need an activated City Tech ID/library card)
REFERENCE SOURCES (a good place to begin: big-picture info on a word/topic):
(search usage of key terms in Google searches, from 2004–present)
RESOURCES FOR GENERAL/NON-SCHOLARLY ARTICLES (step 2: use non-scholarly sources for deepening your understanding of a topic)
(tertiary source on debates; especially good for topics in politics and news)
RESOURCES FOR SCHOLARLY ARTICLES (step 3: here is where you will find the most detailed, rigorous (challenging-to-read) academic work on a topic)
(general array of scholarly texts; not discipline specific)
(humanities and social science articles; theory)
OTHER POSSIBLY HELPFUL & INTERESTING RESOURCES
(full-length films and documentaries)
(literary criticism & theory)
1) Finish the online library orientation (see link in assignment for 10/29).
2) Write a paragraph consisting only of questions about your Essay 2 topic. These can be all sorts of questions—both questions you think you can answer (and want to answer) using research and also questions that are rhetorical or which you have no intent of answering.
Post this series of questions here and bring it with you to the Library on Tuesday. This is where our class will be held—meet us outside the library on the (4th floor of the Atrium (glass roofed) building.
EX: Why do some people think that violent video games make people more violent in real life? Do they think gamers identify too much with the characters and roles they play when gaming? What other theories might there be of how a violent video game could make someone more violent in reality? Are there theories that propose the opposite—that violent video games might make people LESS violent in real life? What do psychologists say about violent video games? Is there psychoanalytic theory that might help explain the effects of violent video games? Do computer scientists and game designers have answers to any of these questions? What role does mental illness play in the video-game-violence question? What role does mental illness play in the gaming community more broadly? Is gaming itself a kind of therapy—or could it also be a kind of illness in itself?
Read Duca’s “The Viral Virus” in Packet I. Complete the library orientation if you haven’t already (see links in HW for Tue 10/29). Finish revising your Essay 2 article summary and post it here. See the attached example of a creative & critical summary for help. Make sure your summary includes:
—-at least 2 different signal verbs
—-a creative response to the article
—-a critical response or question about the article
- Write (and post below) a critical summary of 1 article you are discussing in your Essay 2. Use Christopher Lane’s critical summaries of Bittman’s and Block’s articles as a model/inspiration for how you write your summary. (Remember to include both descriptions of the author’s points as well as your own responses to them)
2. In preparation for our library session in a week and a half, review the Library Orientation page and complete the library orientation quiz.
Read Block’s “Issues for DSM-V: Internet Addiction” and Lane’s “Addicted to Addiction” (handouts). While reading, underline and/or make notes on the following:
–Key Points for Summarizing Block’s View. What do you think Block’s main points about internet addiction are?
–Key Points in Lane’s Critical Summary of Block’s View. In Lane’s response article (“Addicted to Addiction”), which of Block’s points does the author address? How does Lane respond? Does he agree with Block? What is his thesis?
Read Griffiths et al., “The Evolution of Internet Addiction” in Packet I (p. 89). While reading, look up any unfamiliar words or concepts. Bring in a list of these words to discuss in class. Also make notes in the margins that respond to the author’s points. Come to class prepared to discuss the authors’ thesis and your thoughts about it.
Lastly, consider the question of what makes this article scholarly. How is it different from the articles we’ve read so far?
Read Jerry Salz’ “Art at Arm’s Length” in Packet I (p. 1). As you read, underline and make notes that will help you answer the following:
–what is Salz’ thesis about the selfie?
–what are 1-2 arguments regarding the selfie that Salz discusses but doesn’t necessarily agree with?
ALSO: PLEASE BRING IN ALL 3 PACKETS TO CLASS. WE WILL BE LOOKING AT THEM!!! (SORRY FOR ALL CAPS–THIS IS IMPORTANT) 🙂
1. Find an image related to an argument/thesis you’re thinking of writing about for your Essay 2. Post this image (or a link to it) to the blog along with a paragraph or more of description, including the following:
–the “context” in which you found the image: the way you searched, the website you found it through, the person who took/created it and/or posted it
–the “idea” or “message” expressed by the image and its significance (why this idea or message matters–and to whom)
–the “action” represented in the image and how it connects to the “idea” or “message”: where this action is taking place, who the characters of this action are, what they look like, what they are doing, what they might be feeling/thinking/etc. (Note: if your image has no “characters,” that’s fine–just describe the details of the image and the actions/ideas represented in it as best you can)
2. If you want a provisional letter grade for your Essay 1 by the midterm, e-mail me a *revised* version of it by Tuesday.
A lot to catch up on, my apologies!
–If you haven’t yet, complete the make-up assignment from last week, as it will count as your “attendance” for both classes last Thursday.
–If your draft of Essay 2 is due on Wednesday, work on that!
–If you’d like me to give you a provisional letter grade (not a final grade) for your Essay 1, please send me a *significantly revised* version of that essay by Tuesday, 10/15. See my separate post on Midterm and Essay grading.
–Read Mirene Arsanios’ “April-May-June” in Packet I (pp. 32-7). Focus on: how does Arsanios move between narrative (action) and her own analysis (reflection)? How does she reflect on the significance of the events she’s experienced without and turning her experience into an “epiphany” (a “look-how-much-I-learned-about-the-hidden-secrets-of-life moment”)? Where and how does she bring in secondary sources—text or ideas by other writers that she has found through research and reading?
–Read Adrian Chen’s “Don’t Be A Stranger” in Packet I (pp. 62-6). Focus on: what is Chen’s thesis/argument? Where and how does she discuss research that supports her thesis?
Midterm scores will let you know 3 things:
–your blog/participation score (30% of final grade)
–your Essay 1 status (whether or not it has been handed in)
–your overall Midterm Grade (P = passing / BL = borderline / U = unsatisfactory)
Essays will be scored as follows*:
A = significantly and effectively revised from first draft; fully engaging to read for a college-level reading audience; few to no sentence-level issues that interfere with the reader’s understanding
B = significantly and effectively revised from first draft; moderately engaging to read for a college-level reading audience; some sentence-level issues that interfere with the reader’s understanding
C = minimally revised from first draft; some sentence-level issues that interfere with the reader’s understanding
D = minimally revised from first draft; repeating sentence-level issues that interfere with the reader’s understanding
F = not revised since draft one
* = while it is only required that you submit your *revised* essays at the end of the semester, you have the option of submitting Essay 1 for a provisional (not final) grade by Thu 10/10.