Case study: Discrepancy in Concrete Mixture- Raneem Kootabeda

An architect has ethical values. The steps that should be done after encountering such information should lead to a reasonable solution. According to article 4.2.3 – The Architect should notify the owner in writing if errors are found. Even though the client is aware of the issues the architect should further explain the cons of such a risky situation.  The next step would be to fill in the contractor about the superintendents in charge. Then the architect can follow Article 4.2.6- The architect can reject work that does not confirm to the contract documents. The architect should do an inspection of the work in accordance with subsections 13.5.2 and 13.5.3 to check if work is fabricated, installed, or completed. Already there is a violation in contract because the architect was not aware of the change in material which can affect the design. According to Article 4.4.2.8. – The Architect will prepare Change of Orders And Construction Change Directives. The Architect will investigate and make determinations and recommendations regarding concealed and unknown conditions as provided in Section 3.7.4. Once everything is corrected and agreed upon the project can go forward with the payments. According to A201 article 8.3 an extension of time could be granted, The Architect will issue a bond of surety for the Contractor and Owner to document the change of Material performance and that all parties are aware of this change. This will guarantee the performance of obligations under a contract.

Case Study 1 Big box office

Understanding what the client wants is apart of my job. The client has a very specific request for a project they would like me to work on, my job is to meet my clients standards and possibly advise them on what I know as a professional in the field. Although I may disagree with my clients vision, I can be able to work around my restrictions to make not only the client satisfied but the employees as well. The client arguing that if it’s store employees could work in a big box so should its headquarters staff- is somewhat understandable for someone who’s not in a position to actually be the one working in the office. Working in building offices where you have to sit down and spend your time in your own personal space for probably over 8 hours, and to be doing that in a box-like atmosphere is NOT ideal. I would definitely try to advise my client otherwise, and if that doesn’t work I would have to further evaluate ways I can design this “box” where the employees would be comfortable and my client would be satisfied.

To start I would request information about the budget, other programs, and amount of employees working. These issues should be discussed before signing any contracts. I would like to be as neutral as possible but when it’s an issue with experiencing the right space in a program where its necessary that you experience these spaces, I would start problem solving. These issues can be discussed with opinions respected, and influenced when you are a trusted professional.