It could just be me, but I found that the online scholarly sources were frustrating and somewhat unhelpful. I would either get a search result where the download had to be purchase or the results were not what I was looking for. Also there were a few that had the PDF’s online, however when tried to download it, the file wouldn’t open. At first I thought it was just the computer I was currently using, but after trying to gain access on several other devices I realized that wasn’t the case. Google Scholar is the only one that was remotely helpful. The main difference between the regular search engine and the scholarly engines is how precise you need to be with your wording when using the scholarly engine. To me it is not as dynamic as the regular search engine. Overall using a regular search engine gave me more useful results.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Chito2500 on Documentation Purpose
- Jovi on Documentation Purpose
- Jessica on The Life of a Link
- Julissa <3 on Journal Entry 4
- Madi on New knowldege
t a g s
- alternative media
- Badke
- big data
- citation
- copyright
- data
- databases
- digital
- digital age
- documentation
- EBSCO
- Eland
- Flickr
- folksonomy
- Information
- John V. Pavlik
- JOURNAL
- knowledge
- law
- media
- news
- Optimization
- Pavlik
- plagiarism
- privacy
- process documentation
- reading
- reading response
- research
- research journal
- research paper writing
- research process
- research proposal
- Search Engine
- search engines
- social media
- sources
- technology
- terms
- web
- web 2.0
- Wikipedia
- Zine
- zines
Archives
Categories
Meta