Author Archives: rusnuvol

Lab Report 7 Week 8 ( i think)

 

 

OBJECTIVE:    We would try to see how Python works in the Blender Game Engine

MATERIALS:   Blender Python Engine, Python API manual, Professor Baker

METHODS:

Open up Blender, instead of logic editor go to Python Console

Go to blender.org and under Education and Help open Python AP1 2.6

Listen to Baker as he goes through the basics of Python

RESULTS:

I didn’t get to try much stuff out but I learnt that:

Variables are nouns. Functions are verbs

Get is more like the input

Return type is more like the output,

Not all inputs have an output, deal with it.

Python itself is the controller.

There are various ways of tweaking the performance of the game from setting the frames per second to…. something else I can’t remember right now.

DISCUSSION: Again I didn’t get to do much but I’m somewhat optimistic about learning Python, I hope I can grasp the language and use it to animate in Blender.

Mike and Wale Storyboard

 

Scene 3

Scene 2

Scene 1

 

Jpeg and Gif showdown.

Jpeg Image

GIF Image

 

 

My Bio:Wale…i hardly knew me.

Name: Adewale “Wally” Raji

Bio: Born September 1st , (year withheld) Washington DC. Was raised primarily in Nigeria where my parents are from till I was 13. Like apples, if I were to be poisoned, I’ll hope it’s something made out of apples, would still eat it if I knew it was poisoned. Self proclaimed movie critic.  I liken myself to Hank Hill from King of the Hill. I’m fascinated with technology. I hold Larry Brown, Steven Spielberg, Steve Jobs and more recently Elon Musk in high regard. I love steak. Like the quote from Bruce Lee “ A teacher spares his pupil from his influence” (or was it prejudice?)

Research Journal

Based 0n what we’ve discussed in the past week, i’ve learnt just how ineffective google scholar is. I got nothing from the site, it didn’t help in the least. I also learnt about city tech’s vast research database made me proud to be a student at this school (for once). I also experienced first hand how unreliable it can be, because it didn’t work when i needed it to. I also learnt how effective worldcat can be, just a tad effective for books only. It has a neat feature that lets me see what books are available in the city tech libraryThis is something that is actually helping my research right now actually. I plan on taking out an online restraining order against google scholar, it has to stay 5 clicks away from any site i’m visiting at all times. I plan on going back to the research database more often(hope it’s working now).

Research Journal

I actually read the whole of chapter 5 on Sunday night, because i have the book on my phone and read it on the computer. so when you specified pages, i didn’t know where a page started and where another ended. So i read the whole thing. Whoops? I’m still not having any luck with google scholar, it just doesn’t give me anything i can chew on. I have more luck with using the regular google search and searching for essays and journals on my research topic. which gives me scholar-esque results. It would also help if i had a firm grasp/idea of what my topic was, which is something i’m still working on. Stay tuned.

Research Journal 2

I read chapter 5 of Badke, yeah the whole thing because the online version doesn’t list the pages. Guess i need to talk to you about that Prof Leonard.  I found the reading to be quite insightful in that it listed a bunch of places where i can get scholarly articles from. With renewed enthusiasm i ventured into what seemed like a world of scholarly journals. I was yet again met with disappointment. The sites listed aren’t free, they require a subscription. Yes Badke mentioned something to that effect, however, i presumed a lot of the examples he gave would be on a free website. I was wrong. Google scholar doesn’t give me anything either. I’ve tried the truncation with my keywords in regular google search and it doesn’t work for me. I have better luck with Quintura than anything else. So i’m kinda found wanting when it comes to scholarly searches, yes even after a Badke reading.

Appendix-bursting with information

I was enlightened by the Badke appedix reading ( i use enlightened because i’m not supposed to enjoy the Badke readings, neither am i supposed to be entertained by them, i think they’re supposed to engage my attention though, and whatever else begins with en) It showed me what a true research paper ought to look like. What the guidelines were for posing an appropriate question and they type of mindset to have before embark on that lovely journey of researching for a paper. It also shows the importance of  having an outline. Similar to what we did in class for with the bubblr website.

Chapter 3 Badke…..and the rest.

The reading was pretty good. I was dreading reading 15 pages for the Badke reading, but it just flew by. That’s the genius of Badke. I learnt about truncation, the significance of asterisks, parentheses, OR, AND, Maybe, NOT, while searching.(maybe not maybe). I also loved how he explained that keywords are flat, and its the efforts by different websites like Carrot2, Quintura (cool name) and the others (they don’t have cool names so they were put in the etc pile, there’s a lesson here, hope they learn it) that help set up an search heirachy of sorts. Sites dedicated to declustering (or was it clustering) searches. The example that he gave on himself was spot on. I feel the tips and numbered insights (6 or 7) will come in very handy when its time to do the research paper. The other two readings couldn’t measure up to Badke in a million years, but to show how magnificent Badke is, i decided to entertain them, in a condescending manner of course. I found the first reading, which was the longer one, to be….just that, long. It did go into details about the different processes the search engine goes through to provide us with searches. However, i felt this information wasn’t really needed unless i was building my own search engine. The second reading, shorty i call it, because its…..well shorter, i found to be a little more engaging, it provided a brief synopsis (is that the right word?) of what search engines are, and it also provided useful and relevant data about current search engines. Who knew Google made 550 improvements to how people search in 2009 alone (now that i think about it, the yellow in the second o in Google wasn’t this yellow in 2009, and according to the movie, Green Lantern, yellow is the color of fear, so Google is somehow coercing our search, through fear. Hello research topic!!!) In conclusion… i don’t really know how to end, i just used up my last joke and no question is coming to mind. Do i just say bye, i am well on my way to 400 words already. Think (name withheld), think. Google is a massive company, who’s latest earnings call shows them earning $2.7billion dollars in the 3rd quarter alone. Sites like Carrot2 and Quintura exist to make the process of searching even better, yet we have never heard of them ( well i havent). Why is this? because we’ve never taken the extra mile to search for an alternative search engine, we just ingest what the media feeds and and are content with that. However there are alternative search engines out there like Mokoseek that give a part of what they earn to different charities. I say we stop being lazy and do an extra search, for an alternative Google (or Yahoo or Bing).