Finding and Feeding Curiosity: When Students Drive Their Own Learning
Sergio Belich
Computer Systems Technology / NYC College of Technology
Web Programming I
Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity
In this collaborative research activity, students work in small groups (3-5 students per row) during the laboratory portion of class to research and define key concepts introduced in the preceding lecture. Each group is assigned a major topic from the chapter and tasked with finding comprehensive yet accessible definitions using internet sources. Groups contribute their findings to a shared Google document, creating a collaborative chapter resource that serves as a student-generated textbook supplement. Additionally, separate groups are formed to create and present websites based on the material learned throughout the semester, with these projects due at the end of the semester as a culminating demonstration of web programming concepts. This activity transforms passive note-taking into active knowledge construction, particularly engaging for working adult students who prefer hands-on learning over independent reading assignments. The collaborative approach also supports multilingual learners by allowing peer assistance with language and technical terminology comprehension.
Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?
Primary goals include: 1) Transforming students from passive recipients to active knowledge creators, 2) Developing research and digital literacy skills essential for web programming careers, 3) Fostering collaborative learning that mirrors real-world development team dynamics, 4) Creating student ownership of learning materials that enhances retention and engagement, 5) Addressing the learning preferences of working adult students who benefit from focused, in-class activities over outside reading, 6) Supporting multilingual learners through peer collaboration and shared vocabulary building, and 7) Building technical English proficiency alongside programming concepts, 8) Applying semester-long learning through final website creation and presentation projects, and 9) Building a comprehensive, student-generated resource that serves both present and absent students for exam preparation.
Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?
This activity was implemented most extensively during the first third of the semester, building toward the first exam when foundational concepts were being established. During this initial phase, the 2-hour laboratory session dedicated approximately 90 minutes to collaborative research and document creation. As the semester progressed and more advanced topics were introduced following the first exam, the activity required modification—less time was devoted to pure research and more time to streamlining and building upon established foundations. The pacing also accommodated the time needed for multilingual learners to process technical vocabulary and collaborate on language comprehension.
After the first exam, "cheat sheets" containing high-level main topic concepts were introduced at the beginning of each 2-hour lecture and used through the end of the semester. These provided quick, easily absorbed foundations before advancing to complex topics. These cheat sheets particularly benefit students for whom English is not their first language, providing key terminology and concepts in a condensed, reference-friendly format. The laboratory portion evolved to include both definition creation and hands-on coding exercises for web page development, with approximately 60 minutes for collaborative research and 30 minutes for practical application as advanced topics were introduced. Website creation and presentation projects are assigned as end-of-semester culminating activities that demonstrate the integration of all concepts learned throughout the course.
Students are expected to read assigned chapters (maximum 50 pages per chapter) prior to each class discussion, with homework assignments from the required reading due prior to following class, though many working adult students prefer to learn during class time rather than complete pre-class reading. The collaborative laboratory activity serves as both reinforcement of chapter material and active learning for students who may not have completed the pre-reading due to work and family obligations. No additional out-of-class time beyond the chapter reading and homework assignments is expected, which accommodates both the scheduling constraints of working adult students who attend Saturday classes due to weekday work obligations and recognizes that additional language processing time for multilingual learners is better supported through in-class collaboration rather than independent home study.
Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?
Initial preparation involves creating shared Google document templates for each chapter and identifying major topics from the lecture to assign to each group. After the first exam, preparation expanded to include developing "cheat sheets" containing foundational concepts that are distributed at the beginning of each lecture session. As the semester progresses, preparation shifts toward streamlining research processes and integrating hands-on coding exercises that apply researched concepts to web page development. Additional preparation includes organizing website project groups and establishing end-of-semester presentation schedules.
Instructions are given both verbally and in writing to support students with varying English proficiency levels. Early-semester instructions focus on: 1) Research assigned topics using credible internet sources, 2) Provide definitions that are comprehensive yet easily absorbed (avoiding both overly technical and overly brief explanations), 3) Include source links for reference, and 4) contribute to the shared document. Groups are encouraged to help each other with language clarification and technical terminology. Later instructions expand to include coding exercises that demonstrate practical application of researched concepts. Website project groups receive specific guidelines for incorporating semester concepts into functional web pages and end-of-semester presentation requirements.
Key logistical considerations include managing simultaneous Google Docs editing issues where students' visual locations shift as others type, and addressing inconsistent formatting across contributions. Future implementations will require individual drafting before collaborative merging and standardized formatting guidelines.
The activity is medium-stakes—it contributes to participation grades and creates essential study materials, but individual mistakes don't severely impact overall course performance. However, the collaborative nature means that group dynamics significantly affect individual success. Website projects carry higher stakes as end-of-semester demonstrations of cumulative learning and practical application skills. Future iterations will include designated group leaders for coordination, bonus point incentives for quality contributions, and structured peer support systems to ensure all students, regardless of English proficiency level, can participate meaningfully.
Assessment: How do you assess this activity? What assessment measures do you use? Do you use a VALUE rubric? If not, how did you develop your rubric? Is your course part of the college-wide general education assessment initiative?
Assessment focuses on participation, collaboration quality, and contribution accuracy rather than formal VALUE rubrics. I evaluate: 1) Active participation in group research and discussion, 2) Quality and appropriateness of definitions (comprehensive but accessible), 3) Proper source citation and link inclusion, 4) Collaborative behavior during the activity, and 5) peer support provided to group members, particularly important given the multilingual classroom environment. End-of-semester website projects are assessed on functionality, design, incorporation of semester concepts, and presentation quality.
The informal rubric developed through observation emphasizes engagement and effort over perfection, recognizing that students are learning while contributing. Assessment criteria accommodate varying English proficiency levels, focusing on content understanding and collaborative contribution rather than language perfection. Post-activity follow-up quizzes in subsequent classes assess knowledge retention and understanding of both researched concepts and practical coding applications as the semester progresses.
While this collaborative activity allows for flexible, innovative assessment approaches tailored to this specific student population's needs, all assessments ultimately filter back into a traditional grading system based on exams. To accommodate students who cannot take exams due to work or other obligations, makeup exams with different questions are offered to be taken either prior to or after the scheduled exam date. Assessment evolved after the first exam when it became apparent that despite increased engagement and improved materials, some students still didn't utilize resources effectively for exam preparation due to work obligations or last-minute study habits. This led to implementing more frequent, lower-stakes check-ins and bonus point opportunities to encourage consistent engagement with the collaborative materials.
Future assessments will include: peer evaluation of group leaders, bonus points for exceptional contributions, structured peer mentoring recognition for students who effectively support multilingual classmates, and more frequent formative assessments to bridge the gap between collaborative learning and individual accountability. The ultimate challenge remains translating collaborative learning gains into improved individual exam performance, recognizing that working adult students may prioritize work and family obligations over education.
Reflection: How well did this activity work in your classroom? Would you repeat it? Why or why not? What challenges did you encounter, and how did you address them? What, if anything, would you change? What did students seem to enjoy about the activity?
The activity succeeded dramatically in engaging students who typically show low motivation for independent assignments, particularly during the first third of the semester when foundational concepts were being established. Students demonstrated high enthusiasm for collaborative work, preferring this active approach over traditional note-taking. The collaborative environment particularly benefited multilingual learners who could support each other with language barriers and technical vocabulary. Average class grades increased compared to previous semesters, and student motivation was notably higher.
I would definitely repeat this activity with modifications. The increased engagement and improved learning outcomes, particularly for working adult students and multilingual learners, demonstrate its effectiveness despite the challenges encountered.
Several challenges emerged during implementation. Initially, inconsistent definition quality ranged from overly verbose to excessively brief explanations, which may partly reflect varying English proficiency levels and cultural approaches to explanation. Google Docs simultaneous editing caused visual displacement issues as students' work locations shifted while others typed. Formatting inconsistencies required significant instructor cleanup time. Most significantly, despite increased engagement and improved collaborative materials, some students still didn't utilize resources effectively for exam preparation due to work obligations (missing weekend classes) or last-minute study habits, reflecting the reality that Work-Family-Education priority hierarchy persists even with enhanced learning activities. After the first exam, I addressed these challenges by introducing foundational "cheat sheets" at the beginning of each lecture, which continued through the semester's end. The activity evolved from pure research to integrated research-and-coding exercises as topics became more advanced.
Future iterations will implement: designated group leaders for coordination, intentional pairing of students with complementary language strengths, individual drafting before collaborative merging, bonus point incentives, standardized formatting requirements, and more frequent formative assessments to better bridge the gap between collaborative learning gains and individual exam performance. The core challenge remains helping working adult students translate enhanced engagement into consistent academic preparation despite competing life priorities.
Students particularly enjoyed the interactions during the laboratory section, which helped reinforce what they learned from the lecture portion. They especially appreciated the coding exercises, which gave them confidence not only that they were learning but that they could be prepared for real-world applications. The end-of-semester website creation projects were particularly popular, as students could see tangible results of their semester-long learning and felt prepared for professional web development work.This hands-on practice with immediate application of lecture concepts seemed to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills they would need professionally. The collaborative aspect and peer support for language comprehension also contributed significantly to their positive experience.
Additional Information: Please share any additional comments and further documentation of the activity – e.g. assignment instructions, rubrics, examples of student work, etc. These can be links to pages or posts on the OpenLab.
This approach was specifically designed for a unique classroom context: working adult students attending intensive Saturday sessions (split into 2-hour lecture + 2-hour laboratory) who typically prioritize work and family obligations over education. The student population is predominantly multilingual, with English often not being their first language, which significantly influenced both the collaborative structure and assessment approach.
Key contextual factors that make this activity particularly effective: 1) Students prefer PDF materials over purchasing textbooks and rarely complete pre-class reading. 2)The no-electronics policy during lecture creates anticipation for the hands-on laboratory portion. 3) Small group sizes (3-5 students per row) facilitate peer language support, and 4) Saturday scheduling accommodates work obligations but limits study time availability
Technical considerations for implementation: 1) Google Docs simultaneous editing creates visual displacement issues requiring workflow modification, 2) Formatting consistency becomes crucial when serving multilingual learners who need clear, accessible reference materials, 3) Evolution from pure research to integrated research-and-coding reflects advancing curriculum complexity, and 4) Cheat sheets introduced after first exam proved essential for supporting both advanced topic progression and language comprehension
Materials available for adaptation: 1) Google Docs templates structured by chapter topics, 2) Sample "cheat sheet" formats containing high-level concepts in accessible language, 3) Group assignment rotation systems for equitable topic distribution, 4) Peer support frameworks for multilingual collaboration, 5) End-of-semester website project guidelines and presentation rubrics, and 6) Integration models for transitioning from research activities to hands-on coding exercises.
Future documentation will include: 1) Detailed group leader role descriptions and rotation schedules, 2) Multilingual learner support strategies and peer mentoring structures, 3) Bonus point rubrics tied to collaborative contribution quality, 4) Standardized formatting guidelines to reduce instructor cleanup time, 5) Follow-up quiz examples that assess both individual understanding and collaborative learning transfer , 6) Makeup exam scheduling and question differentiation protocols, and 7) Strategies for bridging engagement gains with exam performance in working adult populations.
This activity demonstrates how pedagogical innovation can address specific population needs while maintaining academic rigor, particularly valuable for instructors serving diverse, working adult, and multilingual student communities. The flexibility to accommodate scheduling conflicts through makeup exams and the integration of end-of-semester website projects further support student success in real-world applicable skills.
Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab