the article I am using which is on âcentre for public impact, with a âbcg foundation,â the author is âMatt Klein.â His full name is Matthew David Klein. He is an American political and is also a member of the Minnesota Senate and also a member of the DFL. He tries to help society out and make sure he can do everything in his power to do so. Their audience is the people that goes through the situations that they are trying to fix and not only that it is for the world to see and help out on it too. They want everyone to be aware and be able to come together and speak up on it and help each other. He created this so that he can help others and create awareness so that people can live better and be able to survive and live a good and health life. Maybe this is something he went through and doesnât want others to suffer through the same thing he went through.
The purpose is to give people a better understanding of what poverty is and to help them through tough times. He wants to help people get through it and hopefully reduce the poverty rate in nyc for once. The genre of this is a speech because he said if he would tell his younger self something it would be to engage with the government more earlier. The tone he is giving out is more so fed up and determined because he wants people to live good without having to go through poverty and help put an end to it. Yes this article does help my question out. And yes there are other articles to help support my evidence.
He wants to give nyc a better chance at living and having a better future. He wants to explain to the people How NYC tackles poverty and inequality. he also explains that the team under NYCMayor are using the data to target the impact of poverty. He is interested in social change and wants to do everything in his power to make that happen.  He wants to make sure that the government is apart of it and can help to so that the government can be engaged.
key quotes
âPoverty, too, has remained in the spotlight. Here, we know that some improvements are underway: NYC Opportunity’s own 2017 annual report found that the city-wide poverty rate fell from 20.6% in 2014 to 19.9% in 2016. Progress, then, but much still to do – a point not lost on Klein.â
âFrom analysing existing anti-poverty approaches to developing new interventions and facilitating the sharing of data across city agencies, NYC Opportunity is seeking to help city government bring the poverty rate down further and faster.â
âThe ambition to lift so many New Yorkers out of poverty is on track, helped in large part by projects like the City University of New York’s (CUNY) Accelerated Study in Associate Programs) – an attempt to help more students complete their degrees by not only helping with the financial barriers but also offering guidance around coursework and peer support.
Keon, this is the best example of analysis I’ve seen! A couple of notes:
You’re missing the bibliographic entry and the summary. The bibliographic entry is important so I can look at the source. The summary paragraph is especially important so your reader knows what the document is that you’re talking about– I actually have no idea what this is! Is it a speech? Is he a talking about Minnesota? New York? I’m confused. If you have a summary explaining what you’re talking about, that will help a lot!
Even though this is very good rhetorical analysis, you can make it better in two ways: unless you have any evidence at all that he lived through poverty (I looked him up and I couldn’t find any) don’t fill the space imagining that Klein maybe was poor himself. That’s just random guesswork.
Also: when you make a point, like “The tone he is giving out is more so fed up and determined because he wants people to live good without having to go through poverty and help put an end to it” it would really help to bring in a quote from the speech itself that proves your point. What I’m saying is, explain more! You say this helps you answer your question– tell us how! What does it tell you about your question? Show your readers your thought process!