During the week, I was fill in about the group and the topic that the 2 group pick to work on.
Author Archives: Esmelin
Esmelin Lopez,ENG2575, Anything
So far, the midterms are going well with one more coming up before the break.
Esmelin Lopez,ENG2575,Feedback on expanded definition
It was annoying coming up dry for the history of the word when there limited sources.
Esmelin Lopez,ENG2575,Feedback
Looking at my past assignment with the notes I notice that I left out important things that would leave a reader scratching their heads to who I’m talking about. I didn’t format the paper correctly to the MLA fromat. I knew that my summary was reading off like a list, I did try to fix it but didn’t know how to fix the problem.
Esmelin Lopez, ENG2575
The terminology I chosen is Data-minding.
I haven’t found articles that I like just yet.
Esmelin Lopez, ENG2575, “That what you think” Reading
I found the article to be interesting as to giving some understanding the some people think and why they like it when you go against their way of thinking. Many people and including myself falling into following a way of thinking into a subject.
Esmelin Lopez, John Arnold Made a Fortune at Enron. Now He’s Declared War on Bad Science Summary
In the article, “John Arnold Made a Fortune at Enron. Now He’s Declared War on Bad Science” by Sam Apple, talk about how many scientists that don’t get the work publish end up just locking up away not to be look at again. Where there are work of body by other scientist that have been publish with unreliable data in the work which no one can recreate the same effects. This is where John Arnold step in the article as a man the love reliable data and doesn’t trust anything that can’t be proven. Arnold not a scientists himself started to fund scientists that weren’t taken serious by their peers for trying to see if the work of other scientists that the public taken seriously and following what they’re saying is it really reliable or unreliable. John Arnold Foundation funded scientists that can prove that data in well known research held up. As listening to a scientist believing their work to be true but they can’t replicate the experiment more than one time can lead to complications for person that have try it for example, trying to clear acne. Reasons for that can lead scientist of releasing unreliable research is the incentives to produce positive result were so great. To fix this the John Arnold Foundation are giving incentives in the form of badges for papers that met specific criteria for sharing.
Esmelin Lopez,ENG2575, Reading
John Arnold Made a Fortune at Enron. Now He’s Declared War on Bad Science
IT was interesting to find out we can’t just simply believe every know new study to come out because they’re scientist. The important of this article is that you if you cant recreate the result you got the first time then that data you put out is not reliable.
A Sound of Thunder
Sound of thunder is kind confusing way of telling you a story as it pull you in one part of the story and just kick out on next paragraph.
Best,
Esmelin Lopez