COMD3504 - Section OL69 - Spring 2022

Author: Prof. Matthew C. Lange (Page 3 of 7)

Assignment for Week 10, pt.1

Second Paper:
The second 2-3 page paper is a response to Roland Barthes’ Rhetoric of the Image. The objective for this paper is to analyze the rhetorical elements of a recent advertisement. The ad should be from a print magazine.

The chosen advertisement must use photographic imagery, and must include text. Begin by describing the image in detail, examining the characteristics of the pictured objects, models, environment, etc., as well as the layout, typography, interaction of forms, image style and composition of the entire ad. Try to identify all of the signs at work in the image.

Make your best attempt to articulate the meaning of the image, using Barthes’ terms. What are the linguistic messages? What are the non-coded iconic messages? What are the coded iconic messages? Identify the denotative and connotative aspects, the use of anchorage and relay, the semantic and lexical components, etc. Consider the effectiveness of the advertisers’ rhetoric, and the ideological metalanguage employed.

This response will be submitted as a 750-1000 word typewritten paper, double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman. Include an image of the advertisement under consideration. All references and quotations, including image sources should be properly cited in MLA format. Upload a PDF of your paper to a new Post on OpenLab before April 10. Please also add an image of the ad you examine in your post (this will allow your peers to see the image without opening the pdf of your paper).

Once again, please note: I am well aware of the versions of this essay that can be found online. Submissions that address the ads examined in those versions (i.e. the chopped up Heinz bottle, the VW porcupines) will not be accepted.

Discussion 10b: Sample Topics

This is the second half of the presentation for Week 10, in which two sample ads are examined using Roland Barthes’ approach. Note that this is something of a casual brainstorm for these ads. I would most certainly edit my thoughts a bit when it comes time to type this up! Again, comments are optional.

Week 9 Checklist

March 28 – April 3
Welcome to the checklist for Week 9. The materials for this week expand on some of the questions from last week’s reading involving the media, ideology, and racism. I know that these can be complex and sensitive issues. I’m very much looking forward to the thoughts and comments that everyone will contribute, and hope everyone feels comfortable expressing your opinions in an open and candid manner.

Asynchronous Class Materials
1. Watch the presentation for Week 9: Representation in Advertising
2. Add any thoughts, comments, and ideas that you would like to offer in response to the materials covered in that presentation
3. Review your peers’ Response Posts from last week, then create a new Discussion Post according to these Guidelines
4. Comment on at least 2 of your peers Discussion Posts for this week

Assignment / Homework
5. Read the PDF attached in this week’s Assignment
6. Respond with your notes and questions in a new Post, following the instructions in that Assignment
7. Pay attention to the advertisements that you encounter throughout the week, keeping in mind that your second paper will analyze an ad using the methodology from this week’s reading.

Please also keep an eye out for an update regarding Final Presentations. I’ll be sharing some examples in the next few days.

Assignment for Week 9

Our reading for next week is Roland Barthes’ 1977 essay, Rhetoric of the Image. Here is the PDF:

As you read, please make note of all important terms (ie. polysemy, linguistic sign, connoted, denoted, etc.), especially if their meaning is unclear.  Also make note of important points that you don’t completely follow. Record a brief list of questions you have concerning the essay. When you’ve completed the reading, drop these notes and questions into a post; this will be your submission for the week.

You do not need to write lengthy paragraphs for this one. Scattered notes are perfectly fine and encouraged.

The second 2-3 page paper, due at the end of Week 10, on April 10, will be a response to this article. In this paper, you’ll critically examine a contemporary advertising image in a manner similar to Barthes’ approach. You will be expected to employ the logic and terminology that Barthes uses in this text.

You should begin to consider the advertisement that you would like to address for your essay. It should be a recent full-page print advertisement organized around a single photograph. Please bring ideas to class next week.

Discussion 9b: Contemporary Ads

This week’s discussion builds from last week’s Responses, and from an in-depth consideration of the roles that ideology and racism play in advertising today.

After viewing the Presentation for this week, review your peers’ Responses for Week 8.

Choose one of the advertisements that someone else shared last week. Copy the image of (or link to) that ad, then create a new Discussion Post including that image.

Use that post to write a paragraph or two exploring the ideological framework of that ad. Consider the chains of meaning and the collective intentions embodied in the ad. Examine the ways that the ad reproduces or transforms beliefs. Pose questions regarding any forms of overt or inferential racism that might be at work.

Please also comment on at least 2 of your peers Discussion posts for this week.

Final Research Project and Presentation

The final presentation for this course is designed to facilitate independent research in contemporary design and design theory. Your goal will be to consider the theories discussed in class, and the contexts in which they emerged, then locate current design projects created within the framework established by these theories. The findings from this research will be shared with the class through a visual display and presentation.

Topic
Your research should explore the relationship between specific theories and the contemporary design that puts these theories into practice. Whether you begin with a particular writing or idea that you found compelling, or with an innovative, resonant design project, the objective is to draw connections between the two.

The design work that you address should be a project completed in the past 40 years, with a definite form and scope. You do not need to limit your research to a singular work, but it is not an examination of a designer’s full career. For example, “the work of Paula Scher” is far too broad. “Paula Scher’s environmental design” is a better topic, but should still be more exact. “Paula Scher’s brand identity campaign for the Public Theatre, from 1993 to 2004” or “Paula Scher’s environmental design for NJPAC” are both excellent premises.  

The theory that you apply can begin with one of our assigned readings, but should branch out to include related or derivative ideas and texts. Keeping with the “environmental design for NJPAC” example, you might explore the influence of Rodchenko’s manifesto, “Who We Are…,” on Scher’s conceptual approach and formal aesthetics. This is a good starting point, which opens the discussion to a wide range of possibilities; Rodchenko was a prolific writer who wrote many more texts; designer-writers such as LászlĂł Moholy-Nagy, Vladimir Tatlin or Sergei Eisenstein expanded Rodchenko’s ideas in new directions which are also relevant to Scher’s work; and Scher herself has written about and discussed the ways in which she applies Constructivist ideas to her own work. All of these should be considered. Or you might connect seemingly unrelated ideas; perhaps McLuhan’s media theory helps to identify ways in which Scher’s all-over graphics use Constructivist ideals to convey her message through the medium of architecture. 

From here you might develop a new theory, such as “Paula Scher utilizes Neo-Constructivist design strategies to reinvent the expressive potential of existing media.” Using the example of NJPAC to demonstrate this theory would make for an excellent presentation.

Research to this end should be conducted in a rigorous manner, as if completing a 10-12 page paper. In addition to assigned readings, you must cite at least 10 sources, including proper citation information and a bibliography in MLA format. You will submit your bibliography, along with a digital file containing your poster to our OpenLab site prior to the start of our 14th Week, on May 9.

Poster / Slide Deck
Instead of typing a research paper, the results of your investigation will be presented as an academic Poster Session. This format is well-suited for our purposes in that it allows you to present ideas and findings in a visually stimulating manner, while also provoking new discussions. 

Poster Sessions are commonly held in academic conferences, where recent research findings or studies-in-progress are presented, typically for a relatively small group of peers and colleagues. Information is generally presented as a network or web with different strains of thought branching out from one another, or in a linear progression from a starting point to a final outcome. The former often appears much like the outline for a paper, while the latter can be a sequence of presentation slides. Either of these approaches are fine for our purposes, as are combinations or derivations of the two.

As design students, you will be expected to create visually appealing posters or slide shows. Information should be organized clearly and succinctly, in a style evocative of the designs and ideas under consideration. Though the visuals are ostensibly an aid to your presentation, they should be interesting and engaging in their own right. 

The traditional format for a poster is exactly that – a large sheet of paper displaying information. Obviously the online learning environment has altered the conditions of these presentations, for both our class and for academia as a whole. Yet research has continued around the world, and we will continue to adapt to our current situation.  

As designers, we must not only respond to this environment, but re-write some of the rules. This presentation should offer an opportunity to explore the limits of visual representation in the asynchronous online classroom. We will obviously all need to record our presentations to be shared with the class. For this video, you could do this with an interesting slide deck. Or you could hold printed graphics in front of the camera. You might experiment with a flow chart in Prezi, or create and walk us through a simple interactive website. These sorts of ambitious visual aids can be powerful tools for delivering your message. 

Presentation
You will be responsible for assembling and recording a 10-15 minute presentation, during which you will present your topic, aided by your visual. You should consider the ways in which you will navigate information to outline your topic in a compelling, engaging manner.

You will be required to view, and comment on, all of your peers’ presentations. Your grade for the presentation will be determined by the quality of your own presentation as well as your contributions to every discussion.

Presentations will be shared during our final two weeks of class, beginning on May 9 and May 16. You are required to have your bibliography and visuals completed and posted by May 9. Half of the class will be required to post final videos on May 9, the remaining half will be required to post on May 16. We will determine a schedule for presentation uploads in the weeks leading up to the 9th.

You will be required to post versions of your presentation and bibliography to OpenLab in the weeks leading up to the final poster sessions.

Expectations
– Visuals should present clear, coherent information, in a logically organized manner.
– Viewers should be able to readily identify your research questions, your method of inquiry, the literature employed, and your overarching thesis.
– It should be clear that original research has led to a synthesis unique to your subject.
– Your visuals should be neat and professional, utilizing design standards consistent with the topic at hand.
– Relevant images should be carefully selected and placed within your presentation, with considerations made for reproduction quality.
– Organization and care in assembly will be taken into consideration.
– Presentations should be equally clear, with ideas confidently articulated.
– Presentations should be rehearsed, and should adhere to a planned narrative or script
– Pace and diction should be stimulating for your peers, offering information in a manner that can be grasped and processed in a thought-provoking manner.
– Presenters should pose questions intended to engage viewers with the ideas presented.
– Viewers should ask questions that challenge assertions in a productive manner, inviting the possibility for further research or for applying theories in additional contexts.

We should all begin to consider ideas that we might like to address in our presentations. Potential topics will begin to play a role in discussions and assignments in the coming weeks.

Week 8 Checklist

March 21 – 27
This is the checklist for Week 8. Now that we are officially halfway through, we’ll start turning our attention to the work that will be due at the end of the semester.

Asynchronous Class Materials
1. Watch the presentation for Week 8: Media as Message
2. Leave at least one question or comment on that post. You are also encouraged to respond to your peers’ comments
3. Watch the Final Presentation Guidelines Video
4. Comment on that Post with any questions or concerns that you may have.

Assignment / Homework
5. Read the PDF attached in this week’s Assignment
6. Respond with a new Post, following the instructions on that assignment
7. Comment with any questions you may have, and feel free to comment on your peers responses

You are also encouraged to begin thinking of a Presentation topic. You don’t need to start working on the presentation quite yet, but if you have some idea of the designs you would like to address, you’ll be in very good shape later on.

« Older posts Newer posts »