Recreation Vs. Procreation

I’ve started the Wife of Bath’s Prologue and I wanted to discuss the theme of Sexuality vs. Spirituality. As I read Lines 58 to Lines 125 I realized how much we take the sexual revolution of the 1960’s for granted and how these lines in particular challenged Catholicism and its concept of sex. Catholic doctrine sees marriage as the ultimate role of the female and that it is through childbirth and child rearing that we do what God created us to do. Marriage is a duty thus by extension so is sex. It is done for specific reasons which include galvanize the marriage and procreating. It should not be for your own enjoyment. The Wife of Bath challenges these concepts at a period where Catholicism was at its peak and where women were considered livestock to be sold into marriage. Marriages were affairs which involved the entire family but the Wife of Bath chose her spouses and for her marriage was a kind of liberation and she enjoyed the benefits of it. Today we choose our spouses, we decide the how, when and where of our lives as women but not so long ago our great-grandmothers, grandmothers and possibly mothers did not have that luxury. In fact some women in certain parts of the world continue to be subjugated and exploited. We have a contentious relationship with sexuality and for those of us who are religious the  messages we receive from our spiritual leaders conflict with the liberties extended to us from pass victories. It is a victory to be free to choose what you will do with your body. Even though Chaucer was writing for a vastly different audience I can’t help but think about the Republican party and their policies on abortion and how relevant this is.

This entry was posted in reading journal. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Recreation Vs. Procreation

  1. mcitowicki says:

    I don’t think things today are any better than they were in
    Chaucer’s time: they’re just bad in a different way.

    The longer I live, the more I’m inclined to see our progress as
    a recurring cycle: things are bad, we strive to make them better;
    things get better, we get complacent; we get complacent, things
    get bad again; and so on and so forth.

    I swear, it’s enough to turn one into a cynic.

  2. Tamir Smart says:

    I understand where you’re coming from but I’m a bit of an optimist I believe in the goodness of mankind. I think we evolve and as we do new challenges present themselves but these challenges can be overcome. I’m not saying we’re going to end up in Utopia but as we grow and society evolves you have to take the good and the bad but realize that in some ways our lives are improving.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *