A City Tech OpenLab Course Site

Category: Unit 2 (Page 3 of 12)

(RAB):Uighur “re-education” camps

                    The topic that I chose to write about for my reflected annotated bibliography is the current tragedy occurring in the region of Xinjiang, China. Millions of Uighurs and muslim minorities have been taken and held in these “re-education” camps. The Uighurs are a turkic muslim group that live in the northwestern territory of Xinjiang, China. The language they speak is an Asian Turkic language similar to Uzbek and most of the people practice Sunni Islam. Uighurs are considered to be one of China’s officially recognized ethnic minorities. They have a significant political importance to China due to the fact it’s been an independent region in the 1940s up until 1949 when China took Xinjiang under their control, ever since then there have been many clashes and incidents of terrorism in Xinjiang, and in other parts of China which was either attributed to or claimed by Uighur extremists. The government in China has blamed the protests on violent separatists groups which is a tactic they would use against Uighurs and other religious/ethic groups across the nation. Since 2017 at least 1 million Uighurs have been interned and since then the number of detainees have grown massively. The Chinese government has claimed that these camps are benign vocational centres teaching useful career skills, but a former camp detainee has described these camps as de facto prisons in which mass brainwashing and obedience to the communist party have been implemented. At first the Chinese government tried to deny that these camps even existed, but they have stopped pretending and now are trying to cast them as “lawful and innocuous”. There have been many leaked documents clearly exposing these detention camps and all the inhumane and unjust actions implemented towards the Uighurs such as torture, forced sterilization of women as a method to reduce reproduction, and forced medication. This is ultimately a mass genocide that needs more attention. I would like to find out how this situation can be brought to justice and how we as Americans can help stop this massacre.

Jack, Victor, and Victor Jack. “I Am an Uighur Who Faced China’s Concentration Camps. This Is My Story.” Varsity Online, Victor Jack, 13 Dec. 2020, www.varsity.co.uk/interviews/19990. 

                  In this article Victor Jack has a discussion with Omir Bekali, an Uighur Muslim who survived his imprisonment, torture, and indoctrination at the hands of the Chinese state. Omi was detained for almost eight months in 2017. In early 2017, life seemed to be going well for Omir, 41 years old, father of three, had a tourism degree, and a small business. He had plans to lead the Kazakh delegation to the upcoming international Astana Trade Exposition. In March of 2017, he took a trip to Xinjiang which seemed totally innocuous, to promote the event. During a post work visit to his family in Turpan, on the morning of March 26th, policemen showed up at his door to arrest him. This was just the beginning to his 8 month journey of “unending physical and psychological torment”. “They shackled my hands and put black fabric [over] my eyes,” ÓŠmir says. “I feel my body tremble whenever I remember that moment”. Omir’s parents were Uighur and Kazakh and he was born in Xinjiang. This region has been home to Uighur muslims for centuries, and they make up just under half the population. In 2014, when the Chinese President Xi Jinping announced a “People’s War on Terror” a whole new era of mass surveillance, gargantuan police presence, and arbitrary imprisonment arose. This war on terror was aimed at fighting regional terrorists and separatists. Shortly after his arrest, Omir was thrown into a small police station cell, where he was held for a week, with no explanation. The room seemed to be built for 12 people but had 36 others, everyone including him had their arms and legs shackled. He was then transferred into another police station where authorities tortured him for four complete days. Soon after, Omir was moved to a nearby highly fortified prison camp where he spent seven months locked up with no access to lawyers or phones to contact anyone, still no real reason as to why he was arrested. Then lastly, he was moved to the final destination, the “re-education camps”. Four metre walls with electrical fences surrounding the complex and armed guards patrolling all day and night. The inmates were forced to repeatedly sing songs which praise the communist party, stress China’s greatness, and show gratitude to the president. If the inmates show any sign of discontent, the guards respond with torture. Omir often showed discontent with his arrest and therefore was punished for it, he was beaten half to death, had to stand facing a wall for twenty four hours with no food or water, or placed in solitary confinement. After twenty days Omir was released, his wife had sent countless letters to the UN  and Foreign Ministry of Kazakhstan.

                   This article had many details which were very graphic and real. Pictures of Omir’s scars were included that showed the results from his torture. That picture was captioned “Omir shows the scars on his knuckles, which were beaten by hammer-like instruments”. “I did not confess anything because I hadn’t done anything,” he says. “Maybe they thought after torture I would just confess something I [had] never done before”. This system is totally unjust and completely inhumane. To get a bit more detailed and graphic he adds “They put needles in between my nails and my fingers,” he adds, “then they put iron sticks into my sexual organs”. The police also hung him from the roof of the cell by his wrists and later smashed his knuckles with hammers.Omir thought that his regional travel might’ve been what caused suspicion upon him. Prisoners as young as 15 and as old as 80 were cramped into cells, no one was allowed outside. Not only that but iron chains were tied around the prisoners necks to keep them in a hunched down posture, a submissive posture. Another picture was included in this article, it is a side by side comparison of Omir one day before his arrest and him ten days after his release, and truly it is heartbreaking to see, on the first picture he looks well and healthy, he also had facial hair, on the right he looked like a totally different person, it’s clear he’d lost a ton of weight and also looks very aged. The prisoners were constantly warned about 48 characteristics considered hostile to the Chinese state, which include growing beards, praying, and religious charity giving. Omir stresses that he hopes students can organise more protests and raise more awareness. It is clear and evident that these are not vocational training camps, these are torture camps designed to exterminate this ethnic group. 

Kuo, Lily. “Why More than a Million Uighurs Are Being Held in Camps in China.” YouTube, Guardian News, 24 July 2020, www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKpyaDZkNfU. 

             The Guardian News presents a video on youtube in which Lily Kuo, the guardian’s Beijing bureau chief discusses what’s been going on in Xinjiang, China. She says how there have been many people who have had their relatives disappear into camps and we don’t really know what’s happening to them. She includes a clip from the Andrew Marr show where he interviews China’s ambassador about this matter. In that clip, Andrew Marr shows a videotape of Uighurs and he asks “Can I ask why people are kneeling blindfolded and shaven and being led to trains in  modern China?” The ambassador then replies with “I do not where you got this video tape.” Xinjiang is both politically and economically important to China, they have many natural resources and they’ve been taken under their control. These people have been targeted because they’re all seen as potential terrorists or separatists. BBC has satellite data that shows a whole area with suspected camps. To be in Xinjiang means to be checked everyday and to be in those camps means to be tortured in one way or another.

              After watching this video, I had a few questions in mind. Firstly, why the ambassador was denying what was going on when the video was clearly being shown of the detainees. I do believe that the choice of genre does indeed affect the meaning and credibility. With this video format, videos and interviews are shown to further support the author’s topic. For example, surveillance videos were shown, armed guards were shown, military tanks, and footage of security checkpoints. The civilians are checked multiple times a day when they’re going to the market, driving a car, or when they are taking a train, even smartphones are checked. I believe this just violates the right to privacy. Everytime a camera was brought out to film some authority figure would always come and block it or yell “you can’t film ”. Videos of people dancing and playing sports are shown to show what apparently is going in the camps, which is obviously not what is happening. “All I could think of was surviving each day without being killed” says a mother who has survived the camp. Although this may not be a one go genocide it is a slow process one, with IUDs and sterlizations being forced into women, as well as inter-marriage being encouraged, all efforts to reduce this ethnic group.

Oliver, John. “China & Uighurs: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO).” YouTube, YouTube, 26 July 2020, www.youtube.com/watch?v=17oCQakzIl8. 

           In this video, the host John Oliver discusses his opinions and thoughts on this matter in the show last week tonight on HBO. An ethnic group in Xinjiang, China called the Uighurs have been systematically surveilled and imprisoned in an attempt to wipe the culture off the map. Not only Uighurs have been held but also Kazakhs and other minority groups.  Witness accounts, satellites, and communists party revealed what “seems to be the largest imprisonment of people on the basis of religion since the holocaust.” The Uighurs were being shipped (sometimes not willingly) to work in factories to manufacture products that are being shipped to the United States, products such as masks. Another reason the Uighurs have been widely discriminated against is because they are ethnically distinct from the rest of China’s population which is more than 90% Han chinese. The Han people have held bigoted views about the Uighurs, “ The people from Xinjiang are not very good. Robbers, and thieves.” (said by woman in the interview from 2008 shown in the video) “That is totally not an acceptable way to describe an ethnic group”(John Oliver). All of this was exacerbated by the Chinese government, they encouraged Han people to migrate to Xinjiang with them being favored over Uighurs for top jobs. In 2009, all of this finally boiled over with riots in the capital that killed 200 people, mostly Han chinese. Instead of underlying the complex factors behind the riots, the chinese government painted them as religious terrorism. When China’s president, Xi Jinping came to power, he instituted the Strike Hard Campaign against violent terrorism in 2014. “And think of it as the patriot act on steroids because all of a sudden Uighurs started being treated like they were all potential terrorists” (John Oliver). Xinjiang is one of the most heavily policed areas in the world, the government puts cameras over every house entrance to see who enters and leaves. “…more than 24,000 people were deemed ‘suspicious’ and over 25,000 of them were sent to re-education camps”. There have been many reports of forced abortions and sterilizations of Uighur women, China argues this is all about economic opportunity and an attempt to assimilate a historically ostracized minority. “Assimilation when forced is cultural erasure” (John Oliver). The United States has taken small steps with addressing this issue, the House passed Uighur Human Rights Bill, prodding Trump to Punish China. Although Trump signed he also told Xi Xinping to proceed with building the camps, which Trump thought that was the right thing to do. 

                The author for this video, John Oliver had a unique way of addressing this matter, regardless it was an attention capturing technique. He started off the video with a viral video from an app called tik tok, where a girl started off doing her makeup then quickly changed the topic to address the issue about the Uighurs. It seems to be that the audience Oliver is trying to reach are the younger generation such as teens. When Oliver stated “ Seems to be the largest imprisonment of people on the basis of religion since the holocaust”, it was an eye opener because this just goes to show how severe this situation is. It was mentioned in the video that a few years ago a Chinese reality show went to Dubai and state TV centered all depictions of the women wearing the headscarf in the most bizarre ways, making a mockery of them by covering their scarf with animated helmets or spiky yellow hair, a lady in the clip of the show shown was entirely covered in an animated cactus. 

            In 2009 when the riots in the capital of Xinjiang occurred, I connected this to the black lives matter movement, when protests, rioting, and looting took place it was a controversial topic. It was controversial due to the fact that some people said the looting wasn’t necessary because small businesses were being harmed, others justified this by saying after all this time of staying quiet people finally fought back so nothing should be argued against. When Oliver spoke about the Xinjiang government placing surveillance cameras over every entrance it made me wonder how the people might be feeling, possibly feeling like they have no freedom whatsoever and always watching their move, and forcing themselves to be self aware of every action they partake in. From a CBSN interview shown in the video, this man says “some people, before they commit murder, already show they are capable of it. Should we wait for them to commit a crime, or prevent it from happening..” They were thrown in camps despite having committed no crimes.

              The Uighurs were held extra judicially for the most innocuous things such as growing a beard, fasting, or applying for a passport. Oliver talks about the leaked documents exposing certain conditions in the camps “students may not contact the outside world apart from during the prescribed activities…strictly manage and control student activities to prevent escapes.” From a BBC interview a former internee woman describes her experience when using the bathroom “They tell you quick, quick, quick, if you’re not quick enough they shock you with an electron baton on the back of your head it really really hurts. And they did it alot.” even after all that they had to thank the teacher and apologize, which I find to be totally uncalled for and unnecessary. They have made Uighurs travel 100s and 1000s of miles from home to participate in forced labor, and the chinese media argues that this is positive because  it is“distancing them from religiously extreme views and educating them”. The Uighur people have been working in factories that supply Nike and Volkswagen, the CEO of volkswagen has said in an interview that he hadn’t heard anything about the forced labor going on in the factories supplying his company, which I think is hard to believe and insane since China is the supplier for many products across all maps. The entire global community should be doing more, the U.N should have private investigators, governments around the world should be speaking about this without bending to China’s economic influence, and big multinational companies should be using their leverage to end the abuse from China’s government. 

Ramzy, Austin, and Chris Buckley. “’Absolutely No Mercy’: Leaked Files Expose How China Organized Mass Detentions of Muslims.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 16 Nov. 2019, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/16/world/asia/china-xinjiang-documents.html. 

            In this New York times post, more than 400 pages of internal Chinese documents provide an inside look at the crackdown on ethnic minorities in the Xinjiang region. In Hong Kong, a group of students came home at the end of their semester to finally reunite with their families, just to find their parents, neighbors, and relatives missing. All of them were locked up in the detention camps. Local officials were sent to corner returning students to try and keep them quiet. In one of the leaked documents it had stated “They’re in training school set up by the government.” This was the answer officials were to tell students if they asked about them. The officials would also say that their relatives are not criminals but they also can’t leave the school. The documents included questions and answers, in one of the sections, a threat was included stating students were to be told that their behavior could either shorten or extend the detention of their relatives. The communist party has rejected international criticism of the camps and described them as “job-training centers” that use mild methods to fight islamic extremism. The drawdown of American troops in Afghanistan and other terrorist attacks abroad heightened the leadership’s fears and aided in creating the crackdown. When the crackdown plan began, there were many doubts and resistance from local officials who feared “it would exacerbate ethnic tensions and stifle economic growth.” Chen Quanguo, a zealous new party boss for the region responded by purging officials suspected of getting in his way. For example, he jailed a county leader after finding out released thousands of inmates from the camps. The documents include 96 pages of internal speeches by Mr.Xi, 102 pages of internal speeches by other officials, 161 pages of directives and reports on the surveillance and control of the Uighur population in Xinjiang, and 44 pages of material from internal investigations into  local officials. These papers were brought to attention by a member of the Chinese political establishment in hope that their disclosure would prevent party leaders, such as Mr.Xi from “escaping culpability for the mass detentions. The government sends Xinjiang’s brightest Uighur students to universities across China, with the goal of training a new generation of Uighur civil servants and teachers loyal to the party.  Many of the Uighurs had questions such as when will my relatives be released? If this is for training why can’t they come home? Can they request a leave? The guide responded with firm answers telling students that their relatives have been infected by the virus of Islamic radicalism and must be quarantined and cured. Mr.Xi claimed that violence was spilling from Xinjiang into other parts of China and could taint the communist’s party image of strength, unless the threat was extinguished. 

              The authors of this article went into detail with explaining what the leaked documents were translated to and also included images to explain certain details. My first reaction to this article was that it was pretty lengthy but later realized all the details were vital in order to understand the harshness of the reality of the situation. “The document warned that there was a ‘serious possibility’ students might sink into ‘turmoil’ after learning what had happened to their relatives. It recommended that police officers in plain clothes and experienced local officials meet them as soon as they returned to show humane concern and stress the rules” My initial reaction to this was that all empathy shown was purely fake and just a way to manipulate the people into remaining quiet and calm about the news.  A picture was included in the article captioned “A restaurant in the old city of Yarkand in August. Above patrons a propaganda poster is quoting Xi Jinping: Every ethnic group must tightly bind together like the seeds of a pomegranate.” This is just forced assimilation and the image looks eerie. The question and answer guide in the document starts off by stating that there is no need to worry but that seems impossible due to the fact that all their relatives and neighbors have disappeared without a notice. 

                 In one of the documents it states “Tuition for their period of study is free and so are food and living costs, and the standards are quite high..even better than the living standards back at home” This seems as if they are glorifying the conditions of the camp to help the people feel at ease but if it were me reading that I’d be frustrated trying to understand why exactly my family have been taken away and how soon they can come back. “If they don’t undergo study and training, they’ll never thoroughly and fully understand the dangers of religious extremism,” one answer said, citing the civil war in Syria and the rise of the Islamic State. “No matter what age, anyone who has been infected by religious extremism must undergo study.” Even the elderly that showed no signs of being a threat were taken and surveillanced. I don’t believe that can be truly justified for being a positive thing.  “The authorities appear to be using a scoring system to determine who can be released from the camps: The document instructed officials to tell the students that their behavior could hurt their relatives’ scores, and to assess the daily behavior of the students and record their attendance at training sessions, meetings and other activities.”  Officials were told to say family members including you must abide by the state rules and laws and not believe in or spread rumors, and only then they can add points for their relatives, they can only leave if they’ve met the course completion standards. The scoring system slightly reminded me of the holocaust in which numbers were used to identify the people instead of their names which is immensely dehumanizing.  “… A 10-page directive in June 2017 signed by Zhu Hailun, then Xinjiang’s top security official, called recent terrorist attacks in Britain “a warning and a lesson for us.” It blamed the British government’s “excessive emphasis on ‘human rights above security’
” This is clear evidence that just goes to show that human rights are put beneath other things as if it isn’t a natural right every human should have.

              The sources I have identified were two videos and two articles, both containing detailed explanations about the internment camps and the horrifying tortures going in them. My understanding on this topic has definitely expanded by a ton, I was able to read/hear about people’s personal experiences from the camp. I was also able to learn about the history of the Uighur people and the land that they live on. As well as why exactly they were being targeted. There were many connections I made through my research of this topic, such as the holocaust and the black lives matter protests. Islamophobia has been deeply rooted into some people ever since the 9/11 attacks, but targeting innocent people and trying to force an extinction of a certain group is severely unjust and most definitely genocide. This knowledge is vital because many people need to be aware of all the human rights crisis going on in the entire world, although it is not affecting us directly, in some way it still is, and raising awareness is a step closer to being able to help the people suffering. I believe that anyone who has social media or even a phone should know about this, the reason why is because social media is a great platform to spread awareness about issues like this, the more attention it has, bigger platforms see it and spread it from there, then higher authorities can address it and help.

Unit 2: Reflective Annotated Bibliography

Sumiya Chowdhury

ENG 1101

Unit 2 Project

Reflective Annotated Bibliography  

A presidential election happens every four years in which citizens elect a candidate based on their propositions. It is viewed as a significant responsibility since it operates who might lead our nation and how they plan on improving it. Although every election gets a build-up, the 2020 presidential primaries had the most prominent one. Many, such as I can say that the election, held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, was the most distressing day as Americans patiently waited to see who would get elected as our next president. This year’s political decision was viewed as highly notable since it used an alternate method for taking in votes. Naturally with the new arrangement of casting a ballot came numerous issues. One of the reasons this may be the most important election ever is because of how it will shape America for either the best or worst

Freking, K. (2020, November 07). Explainer: Why is the US election count taking so long? Retrieved December 16, 2020, from https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-40077623.html

Voting electronically is a common way most Americans cast their ballots, but since the pandemic occurred, many have chosen another method such as mail. Multiple American states had made it simpler for people to cast a ballot through mail to forestall long lines of people gathering during the Covid pandemic. Individuals such as trump believe that this system may not be too convenient and is a “whole big scam.” Of course, with many people following this new form of voting comes added issues. For instance, one of the serious issues confronted was the waiting length for the outcomes. Most presidential election results come out within the same day except for this year, which took a total of 5 days. A cause for this dilemma would be the increasing amount of mail ballots submitted and since votes received by mail often take longer to process, it struck a delay upon receiving results. The document “Explainer: Why is the US election count taking so long?”, written by Kevin Freking, explains the mistakes made by some states. It states “However, other states such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – all with Republican-led legislatures and all of them swing states – made a conscious decision to wait so there would be no counting of postal ballots prior to polling day.” “Michigan did eventually allow election officials to process some ballots one day earlier, but the counting of the ballots still had to wait until November 3.” This illustrates how the waited results were pushed back further into a delay due to un-planned timing. One way we can benefit from this mistake for next year’s polls is by setting a proper deadline for receiving ballots and counting them as well. States such as Florida and North Carolina permitted political race authorities to handle mail-in voting forms within the weeks leading up to election day. “In Florida, clerks can start counting ballots 22 days before an election. In North Carolina, beginning five weeks before the election, county boards insert approved ballots into a voting machine, allowing for a prompt tabulation on election day.” We can apply this process in upcoming ballots to avoid delays.

Hermes, Grant, and Dane Kelly. “Clinton Township Voting Error Caused by Macomb County Clerk, City Clerk Says.” WDIV, WDIV ClickOnDetroit, 12 Nov. 2020, www.clickondetroit.com/decision-2020/2020/11/12/clinton-township-voting-error-caused-by-macomb-county-clerk-city-clerk-says/.

One of the biggest dispute of the 2020 presidential election would be how the Trump campaign planned on suing Michigan Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson for permitting idle polling firms to be registered without groups of bipartisan spectators. This occurred due to 10 voters who cast ballots this year but died before the election, and in Michigan state law it conveys “If someone dies before 8 p.m. on Election Day, their vote does not count.” City Clerk Kim Meltzer was sent death certificates for those voters three days after the election and accuses the Macomb County clerk’s office, of not using email to notify and instead chosen postal service. Detroit had the slowest mail delivery in the country at the time that death occurred. According to the news “Clinton Township voting error”, it says, “What this is again is human error,” Benson said.” “Our clerks are human. They are well intended, highly ethical, committed to democracy leaders but also mistakes occur.” This reveals how accidental errors can happen along the way and should not be accused wrongly until told the full story.

Chadwick, L. (2020, November 03). US election: What are five big issues that Americans care about?Retrieved December 16, 2020, from https://www.euronews.com/2020/11/03/us-election-what-are-five-big-issues-that-americans-care-about

This year’s official political race is viewed as striking because of the huge issues it can impact. Crucial problems such as the coronavirus pandemic, economic slump, and racial injustice are some of the reasons why many individuals became passionate about voicing their opinions on whom to decide in favor of. Since the United States struggled with the COVID-19 pandemic, about 82% think the pandemic is a main issue comapred with 24% of Trump voters. As said in the article “What are five big issues that Americans care about?”, it says “Democratic candidate Joe Biden has made Trump’s handling of the pandemic the central tenet of his campaign argument, criticizing the president for hosting large rallies without people wearing masks and for downplaying the seriousness of the virus.” This displays how the actions that were taken regarding this pandemic can be included in a finalized vote. Because of the pandemic, unemployment increased, therefore making the economy another issue for American voters. According to the article, in August, it was found that the economy was a top issue for 76% of individuals. It was found more important to Republican voters than Democratic ones. Another concern that voters found was the racial injustice protests. Thousands of protestors went to go protest after the death of a black American, Geroge Floyd, at the hands of police which sparked a conversation about police brutality and racism in America. President Trump’s reactions to the protests were criticized by many, as he called the protestors “looters” and had failed to denounce white supremacy groups. It states in the article that “Trump not only has an inability to heal a country reeling from racial unrest, he has been an antagonist. This was illustrated by his response to the protests after Geroge Floyd’s killing, using the military inappropriately, stoking police violence, and downplaying the rise of white nationalism in the country.” This suggests that voters will be making a decision on someone who will condemn racial injustice and racism.

Hirsh, Michael. “The Most Important Election. Ever.”Foreign Policy, 25 Sept. 2020, foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/25/2020-election-donald-trump-joe-biden/.

This presidential election is considered important because many people want a better leader to provide more beneficial conditions. Some propose that Trump and the malign powers he has gathered up  have done so much damage to the institutions of U.S. democracy and that his reelection in November could damage federal laws. The article”ELECTION 2020: The Most Important Election Ever” states, “Reelection would vindicate his view that as president he can, as Trump said, “do whatever I want.” It would all but destroy, in other words, the American conceit that the United States is a different kind of democracy than has existed in the past.” This means if trump gets reelected, norms and limitations of American democracy will vanish completely. Although Trump’s reelection seems terrifying, Biden promises less anger, more hope, and light to the future of America. It states in the article that ” a newly inaugurated President Biden, who is a deeply experienced internationalist committed to U.S. alliances, and his multicultural vice president, Kamala Harris, act swiftly to restore U.S. prestige by reversing Trump’s worst failures on COVID-19, political polarization, the economy, global stability, and climate change, as Biden has promised to do.” This provides hope for Americans that with Joe Bidden elected, the future of America can be better.

Conclusion

The 2020 presidential elections defiantly were one of the scariest moments Americans such as I had witnessed. Problems such as the long wait for results on who would win made us all very anxious. Problems like voting fraud were also worrisome since many people were panicked about their votes not counting. Issues such as the coronavirus pandemic, economic slump, and racial injustice show us why this election is so important. Researching this topic had expanded my thinking on all the factors it takes to vote for a new leader. Knowing the knowledge behind this subject is important since it relies on our future and ourselves. Having a leader who’s policies are not the brightest can damage our lives and others. This gives a reason why people, not only in politics, but everyone should be involved with researching about elections so we can better them in the future.

 

Unit 2: Reflective Annotated Bibliography

Carbon Pricing:

J. Siegmeier, L. Mattauch, and O. Edenhofer (2018). “Carbon pricing can spur economic growth more than we thought, says new research” https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/news/2018-news-carbonpricing-economy/:
WHAT IS CARBON PRICING?. (2018). Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition.            https://www.carbonpricingleadership.org/what:

More than decades of carbon emissions are affecting the Earth’s atmosphere, causing global warming and climate change, to control this an economist came up with the idea of carbon pricing. Carbon pricing is a method to help reduce the carbon footprint made by stupendous companies, those which belch 71% of all carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Carbon pricing aims to preserve the environment and narrow the cause of climate change as well as to minimize the use of fossil fuels. The damage done by greenhouse gases is reversible by higher carbon pricing, which helps in limiting carbon emissions. Fundamentally, the government sets taxes upon the industries and individuals who burn fossil fuels. Carbon price uses market systems to offset the costs of emissions to the marketers. It requires individuals and businesses to produce fewer emissions. According to the specialists, it is progressing investment in equipment and technology innovations. As expensive as the carbon tax is, consumers and companies will be more careful about carbon emission and use it efficiently. The manufactures are finding new ways to use technology and products that produce fewer carbon emissions. Furthermore, This is encouraging the market to shift to clean energy and driving innovation in low energy technology. Similarly, complementary renewable energy and energy efficiency policies are important for streamlining emission expenses.

Carbon Pricing 101 (Jan 8, 2017). Union of Concerned Scientist. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/carbon-pricing-101:

Laws and regulations restrain carbon emissions from the economy. These laws set a fee per ton of carbon emission from the entire economy. The owners of the taxable emission are bound to pay compensation, equal to a total load of carbon emission. Those who can overcome the emission will supersede in paying less tax payment. Moreover, hybrid approaches include programs to ensure that the prices don’t go too expensive nor drop; this can circumscribe how prices can alter. This hybrid approach assures the taxes are settled and the mitigation of emissions meets the goal. Nevertheless, the carbon pricing programs are managing energy efficiency policies; such as renewable electricity standards and transportation fuel. These policies include petrol taxes, segregation taxes for coal mining and the social cost of natural gas and oil, the carbon drilling from the ground is an indication of other ways of obliquely concluding the price of carbon in whereby the consumer and company make their decision to use it. Based on the reference the carbon tax and the trading system work in the same way; one determines the price of the emission and the other determines the level of the emission. The level of the tax rate whether it increases or decreases over time which drives the emission that is deducted. If these approaches are well strengthened later it can accommodate strong carbon pricing which can efficiently reduce the emission. Overall, performing carbon pricing doesn’t only benefit the environment but the economy as well.

KIMBERLY AMADEO (August 01, 2020). “Carbon Tax, Its Purpose, and How It Works”
https://www.thebalance.com/carbon-tax-definition-how-it-works-4158043:

The prime reason behind the carbon tax is to guarantee that organizations or companies that emanate enormous measures of CO2, diminish or excrete their carbon footprint, limiting contamination of the atmosphere and the impacts of a worldwide climate change simultaneously. At the point when everybody participates in this purpose, whatever harm the Earth is encountering right now can be depreciated and be ready for mending. Probably at that point, nature would last more and the future generations would have a planet to live in for the following centuries. Additionally, since carbon taxes induce a surge in business’ overheads, most organizations are coaxed to find more alternatives and productive ways of manufacturing products and providing services. For instance, with supplementary carbon taxes, it will be helpful to expand hydrogen engines and solar power which can power all cars electrically. With higher taxes, it will make solar power even more competitive than traditional fossil fuels. This would allow more feasible ways to generate electricity from green power sources such as solar power and wind power. As more green sources are developed it will likewise make us less reliant on oil and compel us to deviate away from the oil economy. The transition to the post-oil economy would be easier for all. Moderately than relying upon atomic power and fossil fuels, electricity will be formed from alternative sources, which is a lot more eco-friendly.

Brandon Miller, (May 30, 2015). “8 Main Pros and Cons of the Carbon Tax”.
https://greengarageblog.org/8-main-pros-and-cons-of-the-carbon-tax:
A carbon levy can support increment revenue fundamentally. In a report by the Congressional Spending Office in 2011,” a $20 per ton carbon assessment would raise almost $1.2 trillion throughout the following decade”. This certifies that this method is a lot more beneficial for the economy but imposes dilemmas toward other things. This will open a lot of chances to deliver green power that will explain any vitality need that is not so much feasible but rather more damaging to nature. This could support a developing growing green movement and a similar revenue can be utilized to fix any harm brought about by contamination issues. This policy can inspire people to be less dependent on oil and fuel for their daily needs.
It is impossible to shift it to no producing CO2 and even businesses can shift themselves in without a carbon tax. It’ll impact the employees. According to the expert, when an organization transfers the workers will lose their job. Besides, a carbon tax is extremely costly, the government would need a large amount of cash to execute this however even if it is contrived by collecting funds it wouldn’t be possible because this requires additional time, exertion, and cash to regulate it properly because it would need money. Besides some businesses would use large amounts of CO2 but it wouldn’t show on the system in this way they can escape from paying and also this would cause more damage to the environment. Carbon pricing rise the cost of fossil fuels for good and service production. It might not be problematic for the high-income households or businesses but it’ll impact the low-income households because they won’t be able to afford the higher cost of the carbon tax.

Why Carbon Pricing Isn’t Working. (July/August 2018). JEFFREY BALL.
http://jeffreyball.net/by-jeffrey-ball-why-carbon-pricing-isnt-working-foreign-affairs-julyaugust-2018:

Critics argue that carbon price isn’t working because it isn’t improving the environment but emitting carbon emissions more than ever. More governments than any time in recent are forcing costs on carbon, even as U.S. President Donald Trump retreats on global warming. Still, there are more carbon emissions on the planet then it was before. A year ago, the world’s energy-related greenhouse gas output which has been on an even level has increased so high and it’ll keep ascending through at any rate by 2040. Subsequently, if the government input more effort by creating carbon pricing high enough which could be affected enough for the economy and which could’ve also brought real changes toward the environment. But the government is more concerned about politics which is provoking the carbon pricing to be too low and too high. Plus, the policymaker is lacking carbon pricing high which induces current carbon pricing to only work for a certain sector of the economy but leaving others to pollute the environment. Even though people are striving to fight off climate change it is not improving at all due to these vulnerable policies. However, a $30 carbon charge is identified with an approximately 6 percent expansion in GDP. In any case, it appears to be reasonable to notice that GDP has not been much affected by carbon pricing. The revenue is intended to be impartial with some of the income acclimated with lower individual and business tax rates. This could upgrade the effectiveness of the economy and its growth. The revenue is coordinated to lower‐income families. There will be an increase in personal consumer spending this could also strengthen economic development in the short-run.

BRAD PLUMER and NADJA POPOVICH, (APRIL 2, 2019) “These Countries Have Prices on Carbon. Are They Working?” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/02/climate/pricing-carbon-emissions.html?searchResultPosition=20:

A carbon tax on carbon emissions will have to be spent on economic growth. The Citizen Climate Lobby proposes a $15 fee for carbon dioxide which is increasing by $10 per year and this will allow us to return the equal amount of net fee for all American households. In this way, it is not only helping to reduce the emission, but it can also generate substantial financial benefits. The economic effects of these benefits, a carbon fee can be divided into two types: direct economic benefits and indirect economic benefits.
An effect of the carbon tax is that the prices of products will go up. In the first year, the carbon tax was introduced at $15 per metric ton, gasoline prices will increase by 16 cents per gallon, natural gas by 19 cents per therm which is a 7.4% increase, and electricity by 0.6% to 1.1% per kilowatt-hour. According to the source without the dividend, the increasing price will prolong the products and services as well as individual fuel demand which could affect the economy due to the lower cost of American goods and lower demand The dividend created by CCL is very helpful for families across America because per month families of four receive an initial discount of $300. Considering the additional costs due to taxes, 53% of households will receive more than their expenses as a result of the dividend, and those families who have benefited will earn an average of $192 per month. As a result of this dividend, 53% of households will receive this extra money which will increase their spending and this spending will be profitable toward the GDP.

Conclusion:
A carbon tax corrects the negative externalities linked with carbon emissions. supported the source, the negative externalities connected with carbon emissions and their co-pollutants like gas and inhalation anesthetic which affect not only the environment but human health. Further, these cause major health risks like lung and cardiomyopathy from burning fossil fuel together with the acidification of the soil and the ocean. Thus, these negative externalities have an outsized impact on GDP because to repair these damages requires additional spending. The acidification of the ocean will need lots of labor within the fishing industry. Also, soil acidification will cause a reduction in crop output. Moreover, the carbon price is correcting the prevailing market failures between carbon emissions and its disadvantageous effects on society and also the economy. Indeed, in line with a report within the New Climate Economy net economic costs are reduced and eliminated once multiple benefits of reducing gas emissions are considered, even without a revenue recycling system. Above all, the dividend is going to be more beneficial for low-income and poor families.
Implementing carbon pricing can accomplish both climate and economic benefits. With the tools and policies, a carbon tax can grow and enact accordingly toward these flexible policies that can be beneficial not only for a country but also for the world. A well-designed carbon tax can help reduce a large amount of GHG emissions and undoubtedly it’ll reduce climate change but it’ll boost jobs and GDP. Carbon pricing policies cause a shrinkage in the combustion of fossil fuels. If it is effective carbon pricing implemented then the low-income and vulnerable people won’t be affected by it and they can be encouraged to bring changes in their daily activities which entails emitting carbon emission through using vehicles, etc. Nearly everyone concurs that putting a price on carbon is significantly essential. Our future generation needs this planet to live and even though there is little change we can improve the earth’s environment by reducing carbon emissions yet it can bring a drastic change for future generations.

Works Cited:

BRAD PLUMER and NADJA POPOVICH, (APRIL 2, 2019) “These Countries Have Prices on Carbon. Are They Working?” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/02/climate/pricing-carbon-emissions.html?searchResultPosition=20

Brandon Miller, (May 30, 2015). “8 Main Pros and Cons of the Carbon Tax”.
https://greengarageblog.org/8-main-pros-and-cons-of-the-carbon-tax

Carbon Pricing 101 (Jan 8, 2017). Union of Concerned Scientist. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/carbon-pricing-101

J. Siegmeier, L. Mattauch and O. Edenhofer (2018). “Carbon pricing can spur economic growth more than we thought, says new research” https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/news/2018-news-carbonpricing-economy/

 

KIMBERLY AMADEO (August 01, 2020). “Carbon Tax, Its Purpose, and How It Works”
https://www.thebalance.com/carbon-tax-definition-how-it-works-4158043

WHAT IS CARBON PRICING?. (2018). Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition. https://www.carbonpricingleadership.org/what

Why Carbon Pricing Isn’t Working. (July/August 2018). JEFFREY BALL.
http://jeffreyball.net/by-jeffrey-ball-why-carbon-pricing-isnt-working-foreign-affairs-julyaugust-2018

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 ENG 1101 – OL10

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑